The "plandemic" theory holds as much water as the "flat earth" conspiracy, where every government is hiding the "truth".
Bumbling from one crisis to another is all part of the plan,I agree. Apart from the lack of obvious motive, my argument against conspiracy theories is that I don't believe there is enough collective wit or intelligence around to sustain such a conspiracy. Take a look at our current government, for example, who bumble from one crisis to another, can't agree amongst themselves and seem not to have any plan at all. How long do you think they could sustain a conspiracy? And it is the same with most organisations, business or otherwise, that I have had dealings with in my life.
If it happened during the term of a Democratic President, I have no doubt it would figure large......and still continues not to add up
That event surely is propaganda gold for Trump to rally his nationalist rednecks and he doesn't use it, odd
In terms of conspiracies, the only one I still cannot dismiss for sure is the 9/11 one and building collapses, especially the third one that collapsed seemingly all on its own without being hit by anything.
I don't know anything about engineering and I was unaware of a third building but it seems to me that if two large objects start to fall apart then the vibrations alone would undermine anything around.
Not locking down involved people using their common sense and maintaining social distancing. Unfortunately a large proportion of the GBP don’t seem to have any common sense or consideration of others.It is interesting that Sweden, the only country in Europe that didn't impose lockdown, is about to be added to the list of safe countries to visit but France and Spain, which have had some of the most severe lockdown measures, are not. I don't believe in conspiracy theories, so it must just be a gigantic cock-up somewhere along the line![]()
Not locking down involved people using their common sense and maintaining social distancing. Unfortunately a large proportion of the GBP don’t seem to have any common sense or consideration of others.
True - but I've seen pictures of people in Sweden ignoring distancing and gathering in large crowds, so bad behaviour isn't limited to one society. I just find it interesting that the spread of the virus seems to be most rapid in Europe at the moment in countries which had the most severe lockdowns. Maybe there is something in the herd-immunity principle. I don't see how else to explain why Sweden seems to be coming out of this better than others.
That comes as absolutely no surprise....Never mind the gatherings of over six, we now have 2 primary schools in Kirklees with positive Covid cases, they’ve only been back a week!!!
That comes as absolutely no surprise....
Perhaps not, but affects elders like grandparents the don’t seem to fair so wellWhy?Thought it didnt affect the younger ones the same?
Different situations, different rules. Why are people surprised? In most countries, different rules have been implemented in different regions. Australia varies from state to state, as does Germany. What makes the UK any different just because the word "United" is in the name?And just to make the gatherings of no more than six clearer than mud, it all depends on where you live as England, Ireland, Scotland and Wales ALL have a different take on things. The mind boggles.![]()
True - but I've seen pictures of people in Sweden ignoring distancing and gathering in large crowds, so bad behaviour isn't limited to one society. I just find it interesting that the spread of the virus seems to be most rapid in Europe at the moment in countries which had the most severe lockdowns. Maybe there is something in the herd-immunity principle. I don't see how else to explain why Sweden seems to be coming out of this better than others.
Different situations, different rules. Why are people surprised? In most countries, different rules have been implemented in different regions. Australia varies from state to state, as does Germany. What makes the UK any different just because the word "United" is in the name?
I can understand the reasoning behind local restrictions/lockdowns, but for ie. Scotland to be different overall rules to England makes no sense whatsoever, especially the groups under 6 with/without kids. A lot of people get confused easy enough as it is, if it’s to do with the ‘experts’ agreeing then bang their darned heads together and get on with it. Me personally - I’ll listen then do what I consider safe for us, which is a sight better than what I’m being asked/told to do! But then I was always, over safety conscious, I should have worked for Health and Safety, I would have been very popular.Different situations, different rules. Why are people surprised? In most countries, different rules have been implemented in different regions. Australia varies from state to state, as does Germany. What makes the UK any different just because the word "United" is in the name?