Jo001
Full Member
- Posts
- 2,052
- Likes
- 8,012
You probably know this, and if so, please ignore me, but the Windermere site isn't actually in Wndermere, it's a few miles outside of it.C&C Windermere
You probably know this, and if so, please ignore me, but the Windermere site isn't actually in Wndermere, it's a few miles outside of it.C&C Windermere
But it does have a bar.
100%
I gather it drove the wardens mad.
Too many chiefs
chiefs and Indians, but you knew thatWhen did we start talking about cooking
Few years ago campsite owner admitted to me that they made money on their EHU . Obviously that would have subsidized other expenses .
Now , possibly , they are trying to claw back that profit
I think that used to be the case, but I'm sure I read at some point that a cap was put on what they could charge at marina's and campsites. But how much profit that cap allowed I've no idea.
All this talk about sites? I thought we were wild campers (off grid parkers). I have not used a site in years. Last time I tried was Baltic Wharf and they were full (well off season) but they wouldn't let me fill and dump but did direct me to a nice spot just under a foot bridge in sight of their entrance and quite convenient for the ferry into town and the nearby dock was well supplied with tap bollards for boats and I carry three cassettes so no probs.
Not sure about that Rob. Who would have the authority to do that ?I think that used to be the case, but I'm sure I read at some point that a cap was put on what they could charge at marina's and campsites. But how much profit that cap allowed I've no idea.
Not sure about that Rob. Who would have the authority to do that ?
Maybe marinas are controlled by the canal authorities ?
The rules around charging for electric are quite specific, so for instance if the same pitch was offered with and without electric the provider has to justify the price by historic consumption of electric or metering. This is why C&MC made electric a inclusive part of all pitches, no calculations to be made. Many other campsites (who follow the rules) will not offer the same pitch with or without, this then means they can claim that a pitch has 'extra facilities' to justify price and not a specific charge for amount of electric used.Apparently it's an OFGEM ruling making it illegal to resell at more than they buy it for.
Very vague though in that they can't charge more per unit but it seems they can charge a fee such as £10 unmetered. It would therefore seem that paying by the unit would be a fairer system.
The rules around charging for electric are quite specific, so for instance if the same pitch was offered with and without electric the provider has to justify the price by historic consumption of electric or metering. This is why C&MC made electric a inclusive part of all pitches, no calculations to be made. Many other campsites (who follow the rules) will not offer the same pitch with or without, this then means they can claim that a pitch has 'extra facilities' to justify price and not a specific charge for amount of electric used.
...but of course it's not that simple!
Electric Hookup Charges. How Much Is Legal?
Electric hookup is an increasingly popular element of the average family camping holiday, especially as more and more tent campers are now making the most of the extra little luxuries it affords. T…blueskyrecreation.wordpress.com
That article is 8 years old!
That is a badly worded item.It's the last paragraph in the link I put up that confuses me Colin;
*** We have received confirmation, from Ofgem, that it is acceptable to show electricity separately, as long as it is a round sum amount, and is not charged on a per unit basis. So; “EHU: £4 a night” is totally acceptable and legal (even if the cost to the site owner is just £1 per night) as it is not itemising the units separately, simply charging an ‘all in’ fee. In this event, it is an issue of terms and conditions of the site. If they charge £4 a night, and you book on that basis, then you have accepted their conditions, and they are entitled to charge that.
That is a badly worded item.
That £4 has to be justified to be legal, you might only use £1, but if someone else has used £7, then it's ok.