Well fairy nuff fellas, I should have expected a lecture
I do hope that none of you smoke, drink too much, have an unhealthy diet, ride a bike motorised or otherwise, or participate in dangerous sports![]()
Last time I was brought off my motorbike was due to the numbtie that was holding the handlebars :dance:I was going to say none of my motorbikes have seat belts or air bags,but then again most folk i know have always been brought of by half blind numties in cars.
I guess it is a matter of calculated risks and rewards.
Not sure how not putting on a seatbelt improves your enjoyment of driving?
Well we've just moved Percy II down to the local mill as we have tree surgeons coming today. Sparky came with us as it was only 300m down a country lane at 6:30am. We could see that between the front seats will be an ideal spot for him if we can rig up something to clip his harness to.
Our base vehicle is a 16 plate Peugeot Boxer so the gear shift is well out of the way on the dash & the handbrake is to the right of the driver's eat. How do we stand with the law & MOT regs if we were to attach a strap across from both seatbelt stalks & clip his harness onto that? Would we be better placed to try & attach it to both seat bases? I'm being a bit vague here as it was pitch dark & early & Phill had to get off to work so we didn't look at it in detail.
Remove left & right seatbelt clip mounting bracket,then get a bit of steel drilled to also bolt there with a extra hole in it for the dog harness,makesure he cannot get to or under the pedals and all should be well.
Orif a seat base mounting leg has access then something round that will do fine.
All proper harnesses are like that , but I have seen some dogs just clipped in to their collar which was why I mentioned it.REC ours is restrained in the car with a body harness and not a one on the neck,
All proper harnesses are like that , but I have seen some dogs just clipped in to their collar which was why I mentioned it.
Ruth
I would (and do) argue that it is not as you assert. The suitable restraint is not to protect the animal (if it were, restraints on the market would need to improve that aspect, not worsen it, as they currently do).
It is a matter of preventing the animal distracting or even impeding the driving. And a simple "sit" is enough for some dogs, whereas chains and cages are needed for others.
You may have a different view, but the letter of the law does not say what is "suitable" or what the intent of the law is, so.my opinion holds as much or as little weight as yours does.
Travel harnesses are different from walking harnesses. You must use one that is designed to withstand the speed of an impact on the fastenings etc. A simple wlking harness will not suffice.
Clipped onto a collar is a very quick way to kill your dog in an accident, I'm sure no-one on here is stupid enough for that one.
Trev ours are usually on their bed on the floor between the front seats, most they can do is shunt forward maybe a foot, couldn’t go through windscreen unless vehicle flipped in which case we are all probably toast.
I may be wrong but I don’t think adding something to seat belt mounting points is valid, it could add forces that the mounting isn’t designed for. Your other ides of drilling and adding an eye is a better suggestion I think.
Just to add, while our van states seating capacity is 4 there are only two seat belts. Just throwing that out there as two would be unsecured on side sofas if we went to maximum seated. Yes I know that’s a different argument and decided by insurance but just adding a bit to th3 discussion.
I am happy to continue with ours asleep on the floor, if others are not then they must do whatever to make it right for them.