Ouch!! (Tyres)

Must be something else they are lying about then eh?
Just a sales pitch, every tyre manufacturer will put out messages saying how wonderful their product is, although saying that I've just looked at the Conti sales leaflet and it makes no mention of holding tyre pressures for longer, so where did you read that?
 
They may not be lying, but they are clearly misleading people. So these tyres lose very little air, well, compared to what? I mean call me old fashion, but one of the most basic functions of a pneumatic tyre, is to lose very little air, that's their blooming job! :p
Are they saying their CP tyres lose less air than a standard C tyre? No, they are not, although they are clearly misleading people to believe that.

Exactly the same with weights, the blurb on a manufacturer's website will tell you crap, designed for heavy MH's, higher load index, etc etc. Compared to what? They don't say, oh I'll assume they mean their standard C tyre, seems reasonable. But that's not the case. Taking a Continental 225/75 16 tyre, the CP tyre has the lowest weight index compared to all their C tyres of the same size.
 
How did that happen and how old is it with it being in PSI? I Notice it also says 69 PSI. They are 5.5 bar or 80 PSI on mine. They are rated to 2400kg aren't they?
In France on holidays, dog jumped out of her skin when it went 'Bang' luckily on a slow country road, as you say their super speed bumps are vicious if your not looking out. Tyre was about 5yr old, with the scooter in the back it does run near max for 116 rated tyre and pumped to 80 psi, think they had both 69 and 80 psi on these can't remember. Anyway being disappointed in that inconvenience on hols I replaced them, rears, with 121 rated commercial Avon AV11, (AS12 now ans snow rated) for more peace of mind/margin, which have been good for the last 5 yrs. 28kmiles. Which loose no air 😉!
 
Last edited:
I can't remember where I read that CP tyres were better at maintaining pressure than normal van tyres but according to google they do. :D

Just about every source I can find (and not just tyre companies) recommends CP tyres for heavy motorhomes and particularly large coach built vans with a long overhang citing increased stability, better MPG, stronger sidewalls, better for standing for long periods of times and running at near max limits.

From the Swift manual.

Motorhome Tyre Specifications

You should note that your Motorhome is fitted with “Camper Tyres”. Camper tyres meet a specific “CP” (Camping P neu) standard fortyres on Motorhomes. The Camper tyres on a Motorhome (unlike a commercial van) a redesigned to carry a significantly higher load for the majority of their life and even when stationery for greater periods of time unlike a van which typically loads and unloads. As a result Camper tyres have stiffened sidewalls to withstand the increased payloads and pressure on them, this extra reinforcement also gives better vehicle stability on the rear with the heavier rear axle loads typical on a Motorhome. The tyres are also designed to improve mileage (wear) and offer better grip off road. When replacing your tyres we only recommend the fitment of CP or Camper Tyres.


I have yet to find anything that says the opposite and that normal van tyres are better or as good. Just peoples opinions on forums.
 
I can't remember where I read that CP tyres were better at maintaining pressure than normal van tyres but according to google they do. :D

Just about every source I can find (and not just tyre companies) recommends CP tyres for heavy motorhomes and particularly large coach built vans with a long overhang citing increased stability, better MPG, stronger sidewalls, better for standing for long periods of times and running at near max limits.

From the Swift manual.

Motorhome Tyre Specifications

You should note that your Motorhome is fitted with “Camper Tyres”. Camper tyres meet a specific “CP” (Camping P neu) standard fortyres on Motorhomes. The Camper tyres on a Motorhome (unlike a commercial van) a redesigned to carry a significantly higher load for the majority of their life and even when stationery for greater periods of time unlike a van which typically loads and unloads. As a result Camper tyres have stiffened sidewalls to withstand the increased payloads and pressure on them, this extra reinforcement also gives better vehicle stability on the rear with the heavier rear axle loads typical on a Motorhome. The tyres are also designed to improve mileage (wear) and offer better grip off road. When replacing your tyres we only recommend the fitment of CP or Camper Tyres.


I have yet to find anything that says the opposite and that normal van tyres are better or as good. Just peoples opinions on forums.

Without data, that's all meaningless nonsense, and more importantly dangerous, I'd say. When it comes to loads/weights on any vehicle, the bit of data that's sits above all other data is the load index.

All Swift have done with that is encourage people to be lazy and not to think. Reading that alone could quite easily lead someone to believe that as long as they have a CP tyre, they are alright, I can imagine some even arguing their CP tyre with a load index of 116 is better at carrying loads than a C rated tyre with a 121 load index. :p :LOL:
 
Without data, that's all meaningless nonsense, and more importantly dangerous, I'd say. When it comes to loads/weights on any vehicle, the bit of data that's sits above all other data is the load index.

All Swift have done with that is encourage people to be lazy and not to think. Reading that alone could quite easily lead someone to believe that as long as they have a CP tyre, they are alright, I can imagine some even arguing their CP tyre with a load index of 116 is better at carrying loads than a C rated tyre with a 121 load index. :p :LOL:

Ah right so they are dangerous as well now then! Ferkin ell! :ROFLMAO:
I'll take em back then shall I and ask for a set from an old transit they have parked round the back then. :LOL:
 
Ah right so they are dangerous as well now then! Ferkin ell! :ROFLMAO:
I'll take em back then shall I and ask for a set from an old transit they have parked round the back then. :LOL:
As I posted before, yes a CP tyre in the size on my van would be downright dangerous, it would not be up to the axle loads, I had this conversation with Michelin technical department where they at first told me to use a CP tyre then had to back track and admit a CP tyre was not up to the task and that they had no suitable tyre in the size that came with my van. To be fair to Conti they do make a tyre which is advertised as a 'camper', but they are not allowed to stamp it with CP as it is built to a higher standard.
 
As I posted before, yes a CP tyre in the size on my van would be downright dangerous, it would not be up to the axle loads, I had this conversation with Michelin technical department where they at first told me to use a CP tyre then had to back track and admit a CP tyre was not up to the task and that they had no suitable tyre in the size that came with my van. To be fair to Conti they do make a tyre which is advertised as a 'camper', but they are not allowed to stamp it with CP as it is built to a higher standard.

But why would you put any tyre on any van that was not up to the axle loads? That's just stupid. I would hope any garage worth its salt wouldn't do that and you would check yourself anyway. A 1250kg 16 CP on my van is the exact right tyre for that van. Job done, hopefully for many years to come.

It seems tyre threads are as controversial as Gassing threads or fcuking A Frames!! Who knew? :LOL:
 
But why would you put any tyre on any van that was not up to the axle loads? That's just stupid. I would hope any garage worth its salt wouldn't do that and you would check yourself anyway. A 1250kg 16 CP on my van is the exact right tyre for that van. Job done, hopefully for many years to come.

It seems tyre threads are as controversial as Gassing threads or fcuking A Frames!! Who knew? :LOL:
My question to Michelin was actually about using CrossClimates, and if they would be available with the load index I required in the size I needed, they where happy to confirm they where soon to be released in the size I wanted and with the correct load index, when they twigged it was for a motorhome they tried telling me to use CP tyres, before I pointed out these these would be under specified.
I agree you have a tyre which is perfectly fine on your van, but don't go thinking that CP tyres are the answer to higher load capacities.
 
My question to Michelin was actually about using CrossClimates, and if they would be available with the load index I required in the size I needed, they where happy to confirm they where soon to be released in the size I wanted and with the correct load index, when they twigged it was for a motorhome they tried telling me to use CP tyres, before I pointed out these these would be under specified.
I agree you have a tyre which is perfectly fine on your van, but don't go thinking that CP tyres are the answer to higher load capacities.

Im not sure I said they were the answer to higher load capacities only that were supposedly better able to cope with constantly running near to full load capacity along with the other "claimed" advantages which are why they are recommended for motorhomes now listed several times in this now epic thread. If they are no better than the slightly cheaper standard van tyres then why has nobody sued them for talking bollocks? I suspect as was said several pages ago there are upsides and downsides. The only downside I can see so far is perhaps a harsher ride. Everything else seems to be a plus point. I tend to drive like I stole it so if it makes it handle better, last longer and they are harder then Im good with that. Bit like by epic rock God knob! :ROFLMAO:
 
Im not sure I said they were the answer to higher load capacities only that were supposedly better able to cope with constantly running near to full load capacity along with the other "claimed" advantages
Here's what Conti have to say in the blurb on the tyre you have fitted.

A robust construction boosts safety during temporarily increased loads according to CP standards

And as noted by yeoblade, if you want a tyre which is safer at higher loads you use the next tyre up the load index and that will not be a CP as the CP standards limit the carcase construction thereby limiting the carrying capacity.
 
Here's what Conti have to say in the blurb on the tyre you have fitted.



And as noted by yeoblade, if you want a tyre which is safer at higher loads you use the next tyre up the load index and that will not be a CP as the CP standards limit the carcase construction thereby limiting the carrying capacity.

Why not quote the entire statement as you seem so obsessed in trying to convince me I have bought the wrong tyres?

By strengthening the tyre construction, the tire is less sensitive to overload conditions. The protection complies to the Camping Pneus (CP) standards and improves safety during motorhome applications with increased loads.

.

I am spot on with what I posted earlier. The "temporary loads" refers to exactly what I mentioned with the longer motorhome overhang at times like going over speedbumps and especially with the scooter on the back. Meaning they are better at coping with such increases of loads than an ordinary van tyre with a much shorter overhang.

Don't worry, Ill keep you so called experts right.

 
But why would you put any tyre on any van that was not up to the axle loads? That's just stupid. I would hope any garage worth its salt wouldn't do that and you would check yourself anyway. A 1250kg 16 CP on my van is the exact right tyre for that van. Job done, hopefully for many years to come.

It seems tyre threads are as controversial as Gassing threads or fcuking A Frames!! Who knew? :LOL:
I refer you to post # 68. :ROFLMAO: ;)
 
Why not quote the entire statement as you seem so obsessed in trying to convince me I have bought the wrong tyres?

By strengthening the tyre construction, the tire is less sensitive to overload conditions. The protection complies to the Camping Pneus (CP) standards and improves safety during motorhome applications with increased loads.

.

I am spot on with what I posted earlier. The "temporary loads" refers to exactly what I mentioned with the longer motorhome overhang at times like going over speedbumps and especially with the scooter on the back. Meaning they are better at coping with such increases of loads than an ordinary van tyre with a much shorter overhang.

Don't worry, Ill keep you so called experts right.

I have stated that I think your tyres are fine.
But lets look at that statement, it is talking about "overload conditions" and "increased loads", firstly you should not be overloading your axle, but if you where concerned about doing that a tyre of increased Load Index would be much better, but that will not carry a CP marking. Also try asking any tyre manufacturer if you can go over the load index, they will say no.
 
Just to muddy the waters further this is what I chose to do last time I changed the tyres.

I opted for Michelin Agilis Cross Climate van tyres. I chose an increased load rating.

The increased load rating gives more load overhead and I can run the tyres at lower pressure than with the original load rated tyres. This will give better ride comfort.

To quote from Michelin:

Believe it - the most comfortable ride you've ever had can be in your van. With the Michelin Agilis CrossClimate, enjoy enhanced safety, traction and steering on all road surfaces and conditions. The Michelin Agilis CrossClimate also offers incredible longevity thanks to the kerbing shields to protect against sidewall damage and the abrasion-resistant rubber compound of the tread. This all-season tyre is adorned with the 3PMSF symbol, meaning you can face the snow and ice with confidence.

Note the strengthened sidewall reference.

These tyres were cheaper than the lower load rated camping tyres. And they have the essential 3PMSF marking which is important to me when travelling in Europe.
 
I have stated that I think your tyres are fine.
But lets look at that statement, it is talking about "overload conditions" and "increased loads", firstly you should not be overloading your axle, but if you where concerned about doing that a tyre of increased Load Index would be much better, but that will not carry a CP marking. Also try asking any tyre manufacturer if you can go over the load index, they will say no.

I don't think it means that though. It talks about temporary frequent overloads and CP tyres being designed to cope better with those. Nobody is talking about "running" overloaded and it would be very unwise for a tyre company or any tyre expert to even suggest that but on a rear axle motorhome especially with a long overhang and especially with a heavy load on the back like a scooter a temporary overload I would think is possible if you go too fast over a speed bump for example even if on a weighbridge you are under the maximum axle weight. Its a fulcrum effect. You could argue all day long (which you seem to like doing) over whether a CP tyre rated at 1250kg is better than a normal van tyre rated at say 1450kg but apart from a few people on a forum saying it is all the advice form the experts online and not just those with a financial interest says its not.
 
You could argue all day long (which you seem to like doing) over whether a CP tyre rated at 1250kg is better than a normal van tyre rated at say 1450kg but apart from a few people on a forum saying it is all the advice form the experts online and not just those with a financial interest says its not.

Does a CP tyre offer advantages over a C tyre of the same Load Index, quite possibly, although don't bother asking Michelin to quantify that (which I have) as they will refuse.
Does a CP tyre offer greater load baring than a tyre with a greater Load Index, absolutely not, and I've never heard anyone claim this, the manufacturers certainly don't claim that, and if asked directly will deny they do, and yes I have asked them directly.
 
Back
Top