Seahorse
Guest
I have read no criticism of the lorry driver that wandered on to the hard shoulder and hit them!!!! Funny old world!
This whole web forum allthreads is full os ,dogs in vans dogs in vets dogs in pubs dogs in parks, what the hell is going on over in t he mainland,im geting very scared.
is it a epidemic or what,im all woft out.
Why is it that every topic that mentions dogs you have to post a derogatory message about them. We have got the message now that you are against dogs but don't spoil it for those of us who do like dogs.
These may be of use to stop your best friend becoming a deadly projectile but sadly I doubt they would have helped on this occasion.
http://www.amazon.co.uk/RAC-racpb13...5285092&sr=8-3&keywords=dog+harness+seat+belt
Richard
you cannot expect people to restrain there dogs in cars can you, after all how many parents do you see with kids and more so babies unrestrained in cars . the police seem to turn a blind eye many times ,it is an offense that should be punished with a driving ban as with drink drive a massive fine and risk of the children taken into care,or put on the child at risk register basically for endangering a child's life .
What makes me mad is when people leave the car running with dogs and children free roaming, while they nip in the shop. I sometimes wonder if when some people breed they lose all their commonsense.
I have read no criticism of the lorry driver that wandered on to the hard shoulder and hit them!!!! Funny old world!
wind you nec in its only a forum,do you take all things here so serious,you would not last 5 mins here even in a school plyground,now i like anamals im going round now to kis my nabours pussy.Yes insensitive. We are talking about the person who responded to someones pet being ill by basically saying shoot it.
Priorities don't come into it. Nobody is suggesting pets take priority over humans.
we are only following normal discussion habits its not really straying from the accident theme and causes /prevention of injuries , also nobody is ranting ,well i dont think soThis thread is about the crash, please don't keep taking it off topic into personal rants about whether or not you like dogs and restraining children in cars.
The crash happened because the lorry driver wasn't paying attention.
Let's not forget that, before we start blaming the RAC for taking 3 hours to get there, the vehicle occupants for having too many dogs, breaking down in the first place or not getting away from the vehicle.
Also, the human occupants were not alright - the last I heard although the 2 in the front are OK the third, who presumably was in the rear at the time of the crash, was still in intensive care.
This thread is about the crash, please don't keep taking it off topic into personal rants about whether or not you like dogs and restraining children in cars.
The crash happened because the lorry driver wasn't paying attention.
Let's not forget that, before we start blaming the RAC for taking 3 hours to get there, the vehicle occupants for having too many dogs, breaking down in the first place or not getting away from the vehicle.
Also, the human occupants were not alright - the last I heard although the 2 in the front are OK the third, who presumably was in the rear at the time of the crash, was still in intensive care.
when there are injuries ,or fatalities the offending driver gets arrested for the accident .no one ever arrests the company transport manager for contributing to the accident .you may ask why should the transport manager/company manager be arrested ,mainly because they give the drivers so much work and strict timetables to work to, contributing to tiredness through overwork .i used to be a drivers mate for super drug and the work schedule they expected the drivers to follow was nigh on impossible without taking risks