Drinking alcohol in your motorhome

Alcohol and sleeping in your motorhome
We ask Philip Somarakis, an expert motoring lawyer with Davenport Lyons, what the legal implications are of parking into a pub car park, having a few alcoholic drinks and then getting back into your motorhome to sleep it off.

Driving one’s “home” to the public house is a pretty good idea to avoid drinking and driving as you now have a pub on your doorstep. Motorhome owners should however be cautious about the risks of being "drunk in charge" of a motorhome if they are staying overnight in the car park.

If you are drunk “in charge” of your motorhome on a road or “public place” you can be arrested by the police and could lose your licence if convicted. This article looks at whether a parking area for motorhomes next to a pub amounts to a “public place” and also what being “in charge” of a motorhome means. We also focus on the scenario where you have evening dinner and drinks.

Pub car parks and opening hours
A pub car park is a “public place” during opening times because there is an implied invitation to the public to drive in and park up to use the pub. The position may change after the pub has closed. In a 1974 court case a person was found not guilty because the prosecution had failed to prove that the invitation to the public to use the car park next to the pub extended one hour after closing time (the time when the police had come to the car park and found the person at the wheel). However, each case is different; for example a pub adjacent to a Premier Inn with 24-hour reception facilities could mean the car park may be viewed as remaining a public place at all times.

Segregated parking during opening hours
Even where there is apparent segregation, by some control system designed to separate motorhome drivers from other patrons, a reserved parking area may still be regarded as a public place. The law is not clear, but it would appear that at least during the day when the pub is open, imposing a control system which only allows motorhome owners into a segregated area would not necessarily prevent that area from being a public place – because such owners would still be regarded as “the public”.
Conversely, if that area was limited to motorhome owners from a defined association, there were barriers/notices and a control system clearly in place then it would be more likely to be regarded as a private place. However a parking place saying “reserved” on it would not do.
Where the law is clear is that if there was a blanket restriction on anyone turning up after the pub has closed and parking up, it is obvious that at that time of night the car park would ordinarily be regarded as private and not a public place.

Drunk in charge of a motorhome
There is no definitive answer to what amounts to being "in charge." If you are the owner or in possession of the vehicle or have recently driven it you will be “in charge”, unless you have put the vehicle in the charge of someone else.
Control over the keys is a good indication of being in charge but is not conclusive.
However that does not mean that an owner is continuously in charge because, in some cases, control of the vehicle has clearly ceased.
The courts accept that an owner is not in control where he was a great distance from the vehicle and there was no realistic possibility of his resuming actual control whilst unfit/over the limit.
Whilst that may suggest that when in the pub “control” by the owner has ceased, the courts may see it differently because of the intention to return to the vehicle at the end of the evening.



Will the police bother you?
Anyone charged with “drunk in charge” of a motorhome has a defence in law. They have to prove that there was “no likelihood of them driving whilst over the prescribed limit”. This can be a complicated process and involves an assessment of what your alcohol levels would be at the time you did intend to drive. Normally this involves having to use a forensic expert to calculate alcohol levels
Here’s an example. You’ve had a couple of pints and shared a bottle of wine with your wife. It’s 11pm and the pub closes in 20 minutes. You are both tired. You suspect you are both over the limit but you don’t have to worry because you are not going anywhere and are not setting off until the morning and after breakfast. As you leave the pub, you see parked up next to your motorhome, a police car. After all, pub car parks are obvious targets by the police for suspected drink drivers.
What do you do? Wait for them to leave or for the pub to close so the car park is no longer a “public place” perhaps? Or stride forth? You might arouse suspicion if they catch you doing a U turn and going back into the pub. If you stride forth yes they may get out and speak to you but one would expect most police officers to take a sensible view here. You are not going to drive off. You are not going to sit in the driver’s seat and fiddle with the controls. If they do ask you what you are doing you will tell them that you are retiring to bed.
All the police want to do is to ensure that drink drivers are apprehended. However, if you have had a lot of alcohol, are clearly drunk and are intending to drive the following morning, you are placing yourself at greater risk here. You will be more of a concern to them, either that they think you are about to drive over the limit, or after your explanation, that you intend to the morning after when alcohol will still be in your system.
The police do charge people with being drunk in charge but normally these tend to be people found slumped behind the wheel of a car in the street outside a house (usually a result of a domestic dispute). Clearly they arouse suspicion and as sleeping in a car is not particularly comfortable, will increase the likelihood of that person driving off (whilst over the limit).
If you drive to a pub with the intention of parking up and drinking, where the land in question is not truly “private” and where you know eventually you will be driving back at some point, you need to bear in mind that the police will assume you remain in control of that vehicle and to them, could drive it at any point.
So consider where you are parking up, whether you might under any circumstances have to move the vehicle and bear in mind it is not uncommon for police to occasionally stop outside pubs. Have a thought to how much you are drinking particularly if you do intend to drive the following day.


Before you start drinking alcohol, you must:
• Make sure your motorhome is already parked up for the night. Do not take the risk of having to move it later to the right place, even if it's just a short distance within the car park or into an adjacent field
• Ensure your motorhome is not causing an obstruction. You should always consider whether you might be asked to move it later so
• Have some evidence if possible of the duration of your stay, so that you could prove your intention to sleep overnight in the car park

After you've had a drink of alcohol, you must:
• Never start up the engine in your motorhome
• Never place the key in the ignition
• Never sit behind the steering wheel or in the driver’s seat if it is facing forwards
Any or all of the above could be taken as indicators that you may be contemplating driving the motorhome and are more likely to attract attention from the police.
And always remember that if you've had a lot of alcohol to drink, you may still be over the legal limit the following morning.




The police’s view
A spokesman for the Association of Chief Police Officers (ACPO) said:
“Regardless of whether you are a driver of a campervan or any other kind of vehicle, the rules of Highway Code and the laws around drink driving remain the same.
“Drivers should not attempt to move any vehicle under the influence of alcohol or drugs and should always ensure they are parked in a safe and secure location.
“If a person is in charge of a motor vehicle on a road or other public place after consuming excess alcohol then that person is guilty of an offence unless they can prove at the time of the alleged offence the circumstances were such that there was no likelihood of their driving the vehicle.
“The advice from the police is clear. Do not drink and drive or put yourself or anyone else at risk.”

More information
The rules related to being in charge of a vehicle and alcohol are covered by The Road Traffic Act 1988. You can view it here Road Traffic Act 1988
 
Here’s an example. You’ve had a couple of pints and shared a bottle of wine with your wife. It’s 11pm and the pub closes in 20 minutes. You are both tired. You suspect you are both over the limit but you don’t have to worry because you are not going anywhere and are not setting off until the morning and after breakfast. As you leave the pub, you see parked up next to your motorhome, a police car.

About the most ridiculous example I have ever seen! It might happen once in 100 lifetimes. But the answer would be to go back in the pub till closing time and if the roz hadn't shifted by then, go on a long walk until they have.
 
How about we stick to the discussion around intent, which was the main point of your argument that a police officer needs to show intent to drive? The other elements of the offence which do exist 'mechanically propelled vehicle, in charge, public road etc can be discussed forever but their meanings currently are in definitions, case law and whoever is presidings judgement.

The key phrase is not the one about 'attempting' that is just part 1a of Section 5 of the Road Traffic Act at the end of that sentence is the word 'or' which leads on to part 1b which deals with is in charge of. A police officer needs only to satisfy himself of part 1a OR part 1b. This has already been pointed out by another poster but you continue to ignore it.

I will ask again please show me where in the Road Traffic Act it says that a police officer must show intent to drive when proving an offence of drunk in charge of a motor vehicle?

The key phrase IS "attempt". If you cannot see that then there is no point in continuing this converstion.

PS the "or" bit to which you refer relates to being "in charge of" which we have already covered in excessive detail and which requires the officer to makea judgement about intent. So whichever way you look at it, INTENT is key to the whole thing.
 
Last edited:
Why should you even answer a knock on the door if you are asleep? You don't have to let anyone in your vehicle. It is your private space. Know your rights.

Bang on....

When you hear a knock, sing in your loudest voice...... ''YOU KEEP A KNOCKING, BUT YOU CANT COME IN''....

Will it work? Probably not, but it amuses me....:hammer:
 
The key phrase IS "attempt". If you cannot see that then there is no point in continuing this converstion.

PS the "or" bit to which you refer relates to being "in charge of" which we have already covered in excessive detail and which requires the officer to makea judgement about intent. So whichever way you look at it, INTENT is key to the whole thing.

We are discussing being in your van after having a few drinks. No-one is 'driving', no-one is 'attempting' to drive. Section 1a is irrelevant.

Yes we are talking about drunk in charge, that is what the whole thread has been about as covered in Section 1b and does not require an officer to make a judgement about intent. Again please show me where in the Road Traffic Act it says this?
 
Last edited:
We are discussing being in your van after having a few drinks. No-one is 'driving', no-one is 'attempting' to drive. Section 1a is irrelevant.

Yes we are talking about drunk in charge, that is what the whole thread has been about as covered in Section 1b and does not require an officer to make a judgement about intent. Again please show me where in the Road Traffic Act it says this?

This is like pulling teeth. You may make an assessment that there is no attempt to drive but the attending officer may decide differently (that is where an assessment about INTENT is critical!). All I can say is that if INTENT was not a consideration then every driver in a motrohome who had had a few drinks and parked upfor the night would be liable to arrest - and that is just plain silly.
 
This is like pulling teeth. You may make an assessment that there is no attempt to drive but the attending officer may decide differently (that is where an assessment about INTENT is critical!). All I can say is that if INTENT was not a consideration then every driver in a motrohome who had had a few drinks and parked upfor the night would be liable to arrest - and that is just plain silly.


I have never drunk alcohol in a tent and we do not carry one with us in the motorhome.
 
This is like pulling teeth. You may make an assessment that there is no attempt to drive but the attending officer may decide differently (that is where an assessment about INTENT is critical!). All I can say is that if INTENT was not a consideration then every driver in a motrohome who had had a few drinks and parked upfor the night would be liable to arrest - and that is just plain silly.

You're right it is like pulling teeth. You have mentioned 'attempting to drive' , no-one is attempting to drive, the campers are all tucked up having had a few drinks, drunk in charge is the discussion.

Thankfully you have hit the nail on the head, every driver in a motorhome who has had a few drinks and parked up for the night are indeed leaving themselves liable to arrest. The reason they aren't is nothing to do with the Road Traffic Act.

Please prove me wrong and show me where in the legislation, a police officer must show the intent to drive for the offence of being in charge of a motor vehicle whilst over the prescribed limit. It's that simple, that's all you have to do to prove me wrong.
 
Not much chance of me driving after a skinful, i can`t even get the key in the ignition never mind actually start it :rolleyes2:
 
You're right it is like pulling teeth. You have mentioned 'attempting to drive' , no-one is attempting to drive, the campers are all tucked up having had a few drinks, drunk in charge is the discussion.

Thankfully you have hit the nail on the head, every driver in a motorhome who has had a few drinks and parked up for the night are indeed leaving themselves liable to arrest. The reason they aren't is nothing to do with the Road Traffic Act.

Please prove me wrong and show me where in the legislation, a police officer must show the intent to drive for the offence of being in charge of a motor vehicle whilst over the prescribed limit. It's that simple, that's all you have to do to prove me wrong.

You have asked the same question several times. I have answered it on each ocassion. You may not like the answer but it is not going to change just because you don't like it.

Perhaps you will understand better if we set up a little example. I am wildcamping in a layby (and therefore on the public highway). I am outside the motorhome with the keys in my hand (I have just accessed an exterior locker). The habitation door is open and an empty bottle of wine can clearly be seen on the table, There is alcohol on my breathe. A police officer passes by and stops. I am clearly "in charge" of the vehicle. There is a strong reason to suspect that I am over the limit. According to you he should not make any kind of judgement about what I may intend to do and should breathalyse and arrest me. In the real world, of course, he does make that judgement. He may even ask me what my intentions are, Then he has to decide whether he believes me or not.

If you do not accept this scenario then please explain why the courts are not full of motorhoming wilkdcampers on d.i.c. charges. Is it that motorhomers are the most sober section of society? Is it that the country is full of police officers who are abandoning their duty? No, it is because police officers make judgements about what is likely to happen and act accordingly.

The scenario above is made up but I have been in similar situations a handful of times in the UK and on the mainland. In each case, I have been polite, answered all their questions and the situation has ended with a cheery "goodnight" (or bon soir or buenos noches). It is not rocket science. It is common sense. The only mystery is that, after all this discussion there are some people who refuse to accept the bleeding obvious.
 
The police’s view

A spokesman for the Association of Chief Police Officers (ACPO) said:

“If a person is in charge of a motor vehicle on a road or other public place after consuming excess alcohol then that person is guilty of an offence unless they can prove at the time of the alleged offence the circumstances were such that there was no likelihood of their driving the vehicle.

The rules related to being in charge of a vehicle and alcohol are covered by The Road Traffic Act 1988. You can view it here Road Traffic Act 1988

Just giving this excellent point a bump. If anyone wishes to further insist that the law does not allow the police the ability to make judgements on the spot they should contact the Association of Chief Police Officers and ask them why the courts are mysteriously empty of motorhomers on d.i.c charges.
 
Perhaps you will understand better if we set up a little example. I am wildcamping in a layby (and therefore on the public highway). I am outside the motorhome with the keys in my hand (I have just accessed an exterior locker). The habitation door is open and an empty bottle of wine can clearly be seen on the table, There is alcohol on my breathe. A police officer passes by and stops. I am clearly "in charge" of the vehicle. There is a strong reason to suspect that I am over the limit. According to you he should not make any kind of judgement about what I may intend to do and should breathalyse and arrest me. In the real world, of course, he does make that judgement. He may even ask me what my intentions are, Then he has to decide whether he believes me or not.

If you do not accept this scenario then please explain why the courts are not full of motorhoming wilkdcampers on d.i.c. charges. Is it that motorhomers are the most sober section of society? Is it that the country is full of police officers who are abandoning their duty? No, it is because police officers make judgements about what is likely to happen and act accordingly.

The scenario above is made up but I have been in similar situations a handful of times in the UK and on the mainland. In each case, I have been polite, answered all their questions and the situation has ended with a cheery "goodnight" (or bon soir or buenos noches). It is not rocket science. It is common sense. The only mystery is that, after all this discussion there are some people who refuse to accept the bleeding obvious.

i can vouch for this scenario john, you may recall my pigeon shooting experience a few years ago ...When I opened the door and he wanted to see the gun there was bottle of wine and the van reeked of it I was cooking the meal in wine. The officer asked how long I was staying there, I answered until the morning, at which stage him and his six colleagues were polite and disappeared.

channa
 
The police’s view

A spokesman for the Association of Chief Police Officers (ACPO) said:

“If a person is in charge of a motor vehicle on a road or other public place after consuming excess alcohol then that person is guilty of an offence unless they can prove at the time of the alleged offence the circumstances were such that there was no likelihood of their driving the vehicle.

The rules related to being in charge of a vehicle and alcohol are covered by The Road Traffic Act 1988. You can view it here Road Traffic Act 1988

Just giving this excellent point a bump. If anyone wishes to further insist that the law does not allow the police the ability to make judgements on the spot they should contact the Association of Chief Police Officers and ask them why the courts are mysteriously empty of motorhomers on d.i.c charges.

You are right an excellant post because it's there plainly in black and white! A person is guilty of an offence unless THEY can prove that at the time of the alleged offence etc etc. 'Prove that at the time' doesn't necessarily mean at the time spoken to by a police officer.

In the scenario you have written in the previous post, you COULD (I haven't said should anywhere) lawfully be arrested for the offence of being drunk in charge. As previously stated the reason motorhomers arn't arrested in droves is nothing to do with the Road Traffic Act. You have yet to SHOW me where it is written in the legislation that a police officer must prove intent.
 
as an interest can you carry an air gun in a Motor Home - I have always fancied having a few shots in the woods for the odd pidgeon but I would need land owners permission etc - any advice?

You can't take a 'few shots' at anything. It is unlawful to shot on public rights of way, in fact I think 50m from a public road, you require permission to wonder on to somebodies land to bag a woodie or a rabbit and nowadays you also need a 'pest' control licence to shoot such species as rabbits, crows and so forth. Gone are though days:(
 
Last edited:
I don't think it is written in the legislation anywhere.

But there have been test cases, and the cops only tend to push stuff which the CPS will take up, and the CPS won't waste time with people in living areas of motorhomes when nowhere near driving seat or in bed etc etc as they only want to prosecute cases which have a good chance.

However, if one is stupid enough to open the door, and if it is an inexperienced officer who doesn't know this area of law well, and if he insists on a breath test, then they may take the first steps towards prosecution, but it will probably be dropped by the station, or the CPS if it ever comes down to it. That's my view given the test cases.

Someone can still prove me wrong and link to a successful conviction though, I am willing to learn...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
as an interest can you carry an air gun in a Motor Home - I have always fancied having a few shots in the woods for the odd pidgeon but I would need land owners permission etc - any advice?

Dunno, but i carry a compound bow and arrows plus a small[ish] target in my van, stashed in a cupboard.

If i get searched i will say i'm off target shooting, if i'm parked up overnight i will say i'm off target shooting in the morning...

Up to the police what they think tbh.......;)
 

Users who viewed this discussion (Total:0)

Back
Top