Drinking alcohol in your motorhome

[John H]

Oh your back, hello.

It's a pity you didn't write those seven words earlier. It is quite obvious you have changed your mind, a police officer doesn't have to prove intent for the offence of being drunk in charge does he?

Those seven words were intended to be a light-hearted joke- sorry you didn't get it.

And sorry too to disappoint you - I have not changed my mind at all but I see you are back to criticising me without actually reading what I wrote.

I'll try one more time (to the sound of wildcamping members jumping screaming fromrooftops) A POLICE OFFICER DOES NOT LEGALLY HAVE TO CONSIDER INTENT BUT HE WOULD BE AN IDIOT WITH POOR CAREER PROSPECTS IF HE DIDNOT. Try to find a difference between that and what I have said repeatedly in virtually every post on this thread! Have a nice night :hammer:

PS Sorry Pendel - I wanted to let you be last, I really did!

 

[Deleted member 5816]

I suppose the answer is for no one else to post on this thread then they might get the message.

Alf

 

[John H]

Stop posting then ... you can't. Last word syndrome or summit.Its so funny winding you up. A one liner is all it takes and you tap away at that poor unstintingly inanimate mute obedient keyboard for paragraph after paragraph after paragraph. Too easy it's almost, almost, no fun anymore.

Well, if its no fun then why are you still here? Nothing good on telly? Or are you just a masochist?

If you really don't want me to post any more then tell your mate Steve to stop trying to make himself look competent by pretending that I said something I didn't. As long as he continues to distort what I say I will continue to correct him. If he or anyone else posts something that does not do that then he or they are welcome to as many last words as they want.

 

[SteveM]

Those seven words were intended to be a light-hearted joke- sorry you didn't get it.

And sorry too to disappoint you - I have not changed my mind at all but I see you are back to criticising me without actually reading what I wrote.

I'll try one more time (to the sound of wildcamping members jumping screaming fromrooftops) A POLICE OFFICER DOES NOT LEGALLY HAVE TO CONSIDER INTENT BUT HE WOULD BE AN IDIOT WITH POOR CAREER PROSPECTS IF HE DIDNOT. Try to find a difference between that and what I have said repeatedly in virtually every post on this thread! Have a nice night :hammer:

PS Sorry Pendel - I wanted to let you be last, I really did!

Exactly my point from the beginning, my first two posts 38 & 52. You didn't agree or acknowledge that part back then but that's ok, we are here now.

Don't kid yourself, whilst I'm still responding, so will you in order to have the last word.

A pleasant evening to you.

 

[Tbear]

It's Friday night and I'm sat here reading this. By God I've become a sad old git.

Richard

 

[John H]

Exactly my point from the beginning, my first two posts 38 & 52. You didn't agree or acknowledge that part back then but that's ok, we are here now.

Don't kid yourself, whilst I'm still responding, so will you in order to have the last word.

A pleasant evening to you.

Well you got one thing right, anyway - I'm still here!

I have read those two posts carefully and, having read them again, I would still make exactly the same point. I have NEVER said that he must legally show intent; I have said that common sense dictates that he must. He would be very silly not to because he would be setting up a case to fail. My criticism of you is that you do not recognise this point but instead repeatedly try to pretend I said something else. If you stop that then you can have the last word if you really want it. Otherwise, I'm still here to not let you get away with it.

 

[trevskoda]

one thing is for sure while we are all here posting we are not out geting rat arsed in our vans,hic.:scared: