The pump is capable of sufficient pressure on the output side to cope with long pipes and vertical distances if necessary, though the burner itself needs hardly needs any pressure. The fuel basically just dribbles in at the rate that the pump doses.
On the inlet side it is reliant on the fuel feed being good. Whilst it may be able to bleed itself if the tank has been allowed to run dry it has such a tiny displacement that this is undesirable and can be a lengthy process, it is best manually bled through first.
An installation of the pickup tube in a vehicle tank will not usually go all the way to the bottom, where contaminants, particularly water, will settle. Also to ensure that the tank cannot be entirely drained by the heater, leaving a reserve for the engine. However this means that if you do run the tank nearly empty that the heater will pick up air instead of fuel and fail.
The bubbles induced by the pump action are not from cavitation (a quite different phenomenon), they are from outgassing of volatile substances in the fuel during the low pressure cycle of the pump. If the pump is installed at the wrong angle they can even prevent it from operating by accumulating inside.
Even UK winters can get cold, I've wild camped in Scotland by a sea bay which had frozen over, hard enough that we could walk out on it. The Truma Combi 2 ran continuously, rated at 1950 Watts output, but it was still not particularly warm. More heat would have been welcome. It consumed about half a 13 kg Calor bottle in one day, judging by the frost line on it. I also had to run the generator for a while to replenish the
battery bank. The 12V power consumption is ambiguously stated to be 1.1A "average". It must have been drawing rather more.
It is specified to consume 130g of propane/hour. I.e my 11kg Gaslow would be depleted in 3.5 days continuous running if true.
Frankly those numbers are implausible, 130g of propane only contains 1.66 kWh of energy, so the Truma would have to be 118% efficient to get 1.95 kWh of heat from it. In practice it seems to guzzle much more. And yes, it is working properly.
Delve deeper into the specification and they say that it consumes 6.9 MJ/h of propane to deliver 1950 Watts of heat. That's also impossible, 6.9 MJ/h is only 1917 Watts. Though that represents 143 g/h of propane which is ten percent higher than their headline claim.
Their numbers simply don't make sense, and contradict themselves. Either the heater puts out less than 1950 Watts, or it consumes more gas than specified. Or both.
Elsewhere they claim that it is 98% efficient. I don't think so, there's definitely more than 39 watts coming out of the exhaust, and is as high as even the best rated domestic condensing boilers claim, with all their sophisticated technology.
1 litre of diesel (or 0.85 kilos) contains 10 kWh of energy.
Propane however much less. 1 litre (or 0.5 kilo) only contains 6.4 kWh of energy.
So diesel is 56% more energy dense than propane, by volume.
I assume that the diesel heaters have similar real world efficiency to the Truma Combi, the operating principle is similar.
The Eberspacher Airtronic D2 is specified to output 2200 W whilst consuming 0.28 l of diesel per hour. That's more believable. 2.8 kWh of diesel to produce 2.2 kWh of heat i.e 79% efficient. Using 34 W of electrical power, i.e 2.83 A at nominal 12V. That's 68 Ah per 24 hours, which is a heavy drain, and would require several hours running of the generator to replenish.
Running the numbers, 1l of road diesel at £1.30/l contains 10 kWh.
1.56 l of autogas at £0.70/l costs £1.09 for the same 10 kWh
1.56 l of Calor (0.78 kilos), in the 13kg bottle, costs £2.13
If I reserved say 100 l of my 125 l fuel tank for heating use, that would be the equivalent of 156 litres of LPG, or 78 kilos, and enough to keep an Airtronic D2 running continuously for two weeks. Still leaving me with enough fuel to drive about 160 miles.
Hence my interest in fitting one for extended cold weather camping, and the convenience of not having to worry about frequently sourcing scarce autogas, or the hassle and expense of using bottled gas.