It's ok, we don't go there.Motorhomes in England face strict new ban and it will last 'for 18 months'
Motorhomes will be banned from overnight parking at certain locations in Scarborough, Whitby, and Cayton as part of a trial scheme which could be expanded.www.birminghammail.co.uk
It's in a lot of different papers Marie. It's even in the Sun, now you don't get much classier than that do you!
And another from August 2021. It also mentions back as far as 2013 there were problems of this nature.
Council considers action to halt overnight sleeping in Whitby car parks
Article from Whitby Gazette Action could be on the horizon to tackle people sleeping in motorhomes in Whitby car parks. A meeting of the borough council’s Leisure Portfolio group will take place next week where a report recommends prohibiting motorhomes and caravan parking on off-street car...www.thecampervanbible.co.uk
Are we all not sure it's nothing to do with dwindling membership of the two big clubs...
Increased motorhome/ campervan ownership and less members dose not run well.....
Just a thought when reading the vehicles should be 6 mtrs apart for safety reasons....
By the fire service my arse....it's a camc ruling not used by anyone else.
So who's been talking to the council...
Article goes on to say ....
"Coun Keane Duncan, the executive member for highways, said: “We are not anti-campervan but there are issues that we need to address and I know that local councillors of all political parties up and down the coast that own campsites are supporting what we’re doing.”
I don't believe the article is true on that score. It is a throwaway line to incite more anger. I'd certainly like to see proof. And you can't pick and choose, you are already criticising it for being misleading. How is this any different?It's there in black and white. Councillors that own campsites, that's who
It’s not disengenious and it’s really naive to pretend that some newcomers aren’t responsible for many of the issues. Let’s put it this way…Typical, keep blaming the new guys. This was happening a long time before Covid struck. The car park by the marina was always rammed and looking like a camp site. AND, motorhomers dodging through the gate to the marina to use the facilities, that are paid for by the boat owners. It really is disingenuous to blame those new to the game!
Yep, Skipton and Boroughbridge. People are deliberately and knowingly breaking the rules on maximum numbers, despite NYC putting it in writing. Then when it’s stopped, those doing it will blame everyone but themselves.It will not be long before Skipton goes the same way.
It's there in black and white. Councillors that own campsites, that's who
One example here;Although we have come across Councillors with a vested interest in campsites before so it may well be true.
I think David may have edited that line a bit Marie.
Although we have come across Councillors with a vested interest in campsites before so it may well be true.
I remember those threads also Marie. There were indeed campsite owners on the council. It's not new, been going on for years and there have been many threads about it.Quite likely, Rob, he's a bit of a monkey that way
The NC500 campsite owners who are up in arms about the £40 "tourist charge" for campers/mohos is a fact.
https://wildcamping.co.uk/threads/highlands-news-new-£40-voluntary-campervan-pass-launched.98388/
https://wildcamping.co.uk/threads/h...ing-on-about-this-sort-of-thing-before.98594/
I have a sneaky suspicion that local councillor(s) in the North York coastal area are also campsite owners, or are at least "good friends" with those who are.... wasn't there a thread or threads about exactly this region (Scarborough etc.) and "nepotism" on the forum previously...?
I don't believe the article is true on that score. It is a throwaway line to incite more anger. I'd certainly like to see proof. And you can't pick and choose, you are already criticising it for being misleading. How is this any different?
I don't believe the article is true on that score. It is a throwaway line to incite more anger. I'd certainly like to see proof. And you can't pick and choose, you are already criticising it for being misleading. How is this any different?
The trouble is, it’s easier to claim that those vested interests have been hidden and other councillors have been fooled, than admit that there sometimes is a real problem.I think David may have edited that line a bit Marie.
Although we have come across Councillors with a vested interest in campsites before so it may well be true.
The trouble is, it’s easier to claim that those vested interests have been hidden and other councillors have been fooled, than admit that there sometimes is a real problem.