All this talk of Scotland , is it time for a wee dram ?
I must be missing the point , I would sooner have my foot run over by a push bike than a motorhome .FWIW, I posted the maths to a shower of anti-4x4 cyclists over on a cycling forum many years ago. The pressure on the road (in psi) and hence the likelihood of damage, is given by the mass of vehicle and occupants (in pounds) divided by the total contact area (in square inches) between the tyres and the road. Although bicycles are very light, an average road bicycle has a miniscule contact area and so the pressure exerted on the road by a typical 'roadie' cyclist is considerably greater than that exerted by a full-sized 4x4! FWIW, as a rough approximation, the tyre pressure also gives a rough estimate of pressure on the road. So a typical 'roadie' (~100 to 120 psi) will exert more pressure on the road than any motorhome I know of, and even MTBs typically run with tyres inflated to over 50 psi...
Think Stiletto heels and dance floors...More surface damage than an elephant as said elephant's foot area is so much larger !I must be missing the point , I would sooner have my foot run over by a push bike than a motorhome .
yes and may be? keeping them in the e.e.u. i hope not, it would be had to see my friends and family, so be-care-ful what you wish for. ok.pj.What a completely blinkered kn*b!
I would like to see the evidence of motorhomes being responsible for ruining Highland roads.
Seems extremely unscientific. Highly emotive and irrational, imho.
How to make friends and influence people - not!
A sad person indeed. Reflecting the views of the constituents he represents?
I suppose he, and they, would be a lot happier if we rebuilt Hadrian's Wall and prevented anyone in a motorised vehicle from crossing the border into Scotland at all.![]()
Elephants dancing in Stiletto heels??? Now that would be worth seeingThink Stiletto heels and dance floors...More surface damage than an elephant as said elephant's foot area is so much larger !
Err...They can have Northumberland. Another place that doesn't like motorhomes.
Yes go on. I read in the "I" yesterday that the Northumberland accent is nearer Scots than Geordie, so I'm sorry you'll have to buy a skirt and learn to live on porridge, haggis and square sausages.Err...
No.
K![]()
Yes go on. I read in the "I" yesterday that the Northumberland accent is nearer Scots than Geordie, so I'm sorry you'll have to buy a skirt and learn to live on porridge, haggis and square sausages.
I came over all weak after reading that comment of yours.The Scottish accent is harsh by comparison - depending which part of Scotland of course.
The proper Northumbrian is much softer. The only similarity I can think of with the Scots is that they roll their 'R's in a Burns-like way.
I think it's a lovely accent. Nicer even than Geordie, if that's possible![]()
Whether tourism is beneficial depends upon your point of view. As a naturalised Cornishman who doesn't profit from tourism, the annual influx of emmets is a PITA. For a quarter or more of each year, the roads are choked and the campsites full to bursting -- so locals can't go anywhere quickly and you can't get a pitch unless you book weeks in advance. I suspect that it's the same for most Scots who don't work in the tourist industry and so I can understand why they kick out. (Just saying...)Unless and until the benefits of tourism are shared, this is understandable.
However, a congestion charge normally applies to locals as well as visitors. Interesting idea.
Last year they were pressing for a tourist tax.
Next year they'll be begging for a tourist.
Whether tourism is beneficial depends upon your point of view. As a naturalised Cornishman who doesn't profit from tourism, the annual influx of emmets is a PITA. For a quarter or more of each year, the roads are choked and the campsites full to bursting -- so locals can't go anywhere quickly and you can't get a pitch unless you book weeks in advance. I suspect that it's the same for most Scots who don't work in the tourist industry and so I can understand why they kick out. (Just saying...)
Whether tourism is beneficial depends upon your point of view. As a naturalised Cornishman who doesn't profit from tourism, the annual influx of emmets is a PITA. For a quarter or more of each year, the roads are choked and the campsites full to bursting -- so locals can't go anywhere quickly and you can't get a pitch unless you book weeks in advance. I suspect that it's the same for most Scots who don't work in the tourist industry and so I can understand why they kick out. (Just saying...)
Posterior In Tremendous AgonyBtw what does PITA mean?
I have seen a few here,Elephants dancing in Stiletto heels??? Now that would be worth seeing
K![]()
Geoff,
Cornwall And Devon are lovely places. Although it’s a fair old distance for us to get there from Scotland I have done so several times and have enjoyed my time there. But Cornwall without a working community dependent on amongst other things tourism would not be what it is today. You and others who only view Cornwall as a place of retirement would not have many of the facilities that you both need and enjoy. You say you cannot book into campsites without having to book months in advance. Without infiltration from outside Cornwall there would not be many if any campsites. Cornwall is not an island, and neither are any rural locations in our islands. You need visitors in numbers for the very survival of what you take for granted. You also stated that your roads are choked up, having driven your roads I am not surprised, you have some of the worse roads I have ever driven upon. Perhaps instead of blaming the very tourists you need for such issues, you should consider laying the blame on lack of investment on your road network.