mrbadger
Guest
Aint nobody gonna Cull Me!!!
would this be the same government who were elected with well less than 50 percent of the vote;I've just signed this petition, for two main reasons:
1/ Badgers are part of our wildlife heritage. To even consider their mass slaughter instead of following the vaccination route is inhuman and just another example of putting profit/costs before doing the right thing, especially when nothing has been proven conclusively.
2/ Because the badgers are unable to sign the petition themselves!
Incidentally, I came across an online e-petition with the heading of "HM Government", hoping to gather votes towards the re-introduction of the barbaric "sport" of fox-hunting. Their wording is as follows: (forgive me for not posting the link)
HM Government
Referendum to Bring back Fox Hunting
Responsible department: Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
It has been called the death of the countryside. Fox Hunting is one of the greatest traditions in the UK and is still widely practised across the countryside in which tens of thousands of people partake and enjoy. We should not just push this issue into a corner and forget about it. When fox hunting was banned 51% supported the ban. But 49% were pro hunting and should not be sidelined because of only 2%. We demand a referendum to revoke the ban on Fox Hunting.
(I suppose a cull of our politicians would be out of the question??).
In my opinion DEFRA should encourage farmers to look at the conditions they allow their cattle to live in. Most herds live indoors during the winter and some big commercial herds live indoors all year round. They generally exist in cold, damp crowded conditions amongst their own excrement with little ventilation, allowing the bacterium to thrive. Similar indeed to the conditions many humans used to live in up until the 1950's when TB was rife amongst the population.
To my mind the solution lies in allowing cattle to be outside as much as possible as is their natural state of being. If, because of ground conditions, this can't be possible then an improvement in shed and barn conditions for these animals, subsidised by the government must surely be less costly than compensating farmers for their losses, culling badgers and developing a vaccination.