. We all require the same things such as a safe place to park without being troubled, access to water & emptying. I am not arguing about points of law or legal definitions just making a point, whatever our views are on the travelling community good or bad. When we retired we considered renting out our house & going full timing. After a few trips we came to conclusion that we liked trips of about 3 months then have a break to plan our next trip & this is what we do. For the 3 months we are touring are we not travellers in any definition of the term We are having to live with whatever we packed, we have no permanent home (until we return) so shouldn't this give us the right to be labeled as travellers with all the perks (if there are any )
Where do I stand in all this then?
I travelled for over 20 years to a lot of countries.
I have lived in tents in the bush and even shipping containers (not much fun living in a metal box, close to the Equator).
For all of that I am still an ethnic Northerner and regularly pilloried by stuck up posh Southerners (yes you dezi).
I need JohnH to give a judgement on this. You know John, the man who can start an argument in an empty house.