Open letter to Caravan and Motorhome Club

I think you'll find local government are going to have their hands full for many years to come dealing with the huge changes in society post Covid.

I think you'll find the local government are only able to focus any of their budgets on things they 'have' to pay for. Unless someone on here knows better.

I worked in local authority for over 30 years commissioning services for people with severe and complex needs. When the government of the day massively slashed what they gave to local authorities, and health authorities had to start being fully accountable for their budgets instead of getting them written off, the local authority funding for all departments got extremely difficult to manage, and not just in social care.

In social care, our meetings with health were bartering systems in respect of the people we commissioned services for. Our head of service and social work managers would argue with the consultant psychiatrists - if you will take this persons fee's in your budget, we will take that one's. And over the last 10 years or so, I helped to develop a pricing tool that was realistic to help prevent home owners from overcharging, whilst taking reasonable account of their actual outgoings. We also had the facility to agree extra amounts for certain things where they could PROVE that there were ongoing and considerable reasons for any uplift in fee's.

I have recently had letters from my council asking what we would rather the available money went to : road repairs, bin collections, etc., etc. Don't forget, LA's are mostly comprising of essential services or services of last resort where people who cannot afford to pay for their own have no option but to go.

Post Covid, many care homes for older people will find that they will have many empty beds. Hopefully, my colleagues will take the opportunity to close some of the worst ones down whilst transferring some of the people to homes where their needs and hopefully their medical issues will be better addressed, as well as their mental health needs.

And no, I did not just stand leaning on my shovel ! 😜
 
I have penned the following to the Caravan and Motorhome Club. Before I press send I would welcome any comments, apart from those relating to P*****g in the wind of which I'm sure there will be plenty!

Open letter to the Caravan and Motorhome Club


Dear Sirs

I should like to know what efforts the Club has in the pipeline to address the needs of touring motorhomes, both in terms of basic overnight spaces and access to water and dump station facilities. I ask because I am reviewing whether I wish to remain a member once my subscription expires.

I along with many thousands of others am a motorhome owner and a member of the C&MC. Motorhomes offer the freedom of unscheduled travel, and the autonomy of not needing sanitary facilities every day. Because I have medical conditions which make it difficult to know far in advance when and how far I may travel on a particular day this is especially important. Indeed the motorhome is a lifeline enabling me to visit relatives in far flung places, journeys that for others can be done in a day but for me require a number of overnight stops. I have encountered many other motorhome owners with their own reasons for why it is difficult to plan and book ahead, for many others this freedom is the very essence of motorhoming.

Because my vehicle is fully self contained I use primarily CL sites as I do not need to pay for the expensive sanitary and other facilities provided at club sites, indeed in the summer months I don’t even need electricity. Although in truth I have no desire anyway to sit in a site in walking distance of nowhere with nothing but hundreds of others campers to stare at.

In the summer in the UK it is almost impossible to find sites without booking ahead. I consequently normally spend most of my time abroad where specific facilities are provided for motorhomes, where motorhomes are generally more welcome, and pre-booking is not required. This is something I share with the thousands of other motorhomers who stream across the Channel every year. In winter the majority of UK sites are closed even though many motorhomers travel all year.

In a normal year thousands of European motorhomers visit the UK expecting to turn up without booking and find facilities for motorhomes like at home. Every year an increasing volume of motorhomes are rented out to first timers who have little idea how to behave. Every year many fail to find a space for the night. Not surprising then that there is an increasing volume of complaints about motorhomes clogging up carparks and lay-bys, and concerns about dumping of waste. With the relaxing of Covid Rules anticipated in the near future, and the current scrabble to book up campsites, this problem is going to be seriously exacerbated by the sudden taking to the road by UK motorhomers who would otherwise be abroad, hirers, and the additional first timers created by the current surge in motorhome sales.

I am disappointed that the C&MC despite its new name does little to provide for the particular needs of touring motorhomes. Although it may be optimistic to expect the Club to provide new stand alone Aires / Sostas / Stellplatze on the continental model, I would note that many European campsites have devoted part of their space to basic overnight motorhome stops, and almost universally make their dump station facilities available to touring motorhomes for a charge.

Whenever I have in the past raised this subject on your forum all I get is smug replies from the entrenched caravanners and ex-caravanners that there is no demand for such facilities.

The Club at least could encourage provision of motorhome specific basic CL sites, and in particular to make its dump stations available for a charge. With the closure of many public toilets there will be an extraordinary demand for dump stations this year. The Camping and Caravanning Club already offers dump facilities for a charge, I see little reason why the C&MC could not so also and encourage some CLs to do likewise.

Given that the Club has had the benefit of public money for staff furlough schemes it could at least provide this small public service in return.


Regards
Ian Lones
me to ,ok.pj
 
I tried almost exactly the same thing 2 years ago and had a very short response; they were not considering anything like it... I quoted CCC as well but no joy from CAMC, so I did not renew my subscription and stayed with CCC. Occasionally we do stay at CMC licenced sites, but just pay the full amount instead of the CMC discount.
no liky ok.pj. oh sites i mean
 
The C&MC will take more notice if the economic and financial benefits are strongly highlighted. It is all about money at the end of the day.

Remember the club pay local rates on its sites, employ site staff, and are reliant on obtaining ongoing licensing arrangements to operate a campsite, all in accordance with the legal and planning requirements of the UK.

It may require changes to their licensing arrangements to operate such arrangements as proposed, especially if facilities are outside the normal site barrier and boundary. And their rates bill may rise if sites are open all the year round. These type of points have to be covered and answered in such a way that it actually is a no brainer to offer such a service!

A big issue for the club going forward is that motorhomes and camper vans probably now make up over 50% of the mobile leisure home sales, outselling caravans. But the club itself may not recognise this as those with such vehicles do not consider club membership worthwhile for the reasons set out in the letter.

If they want to increase the membership numbers of those who own motorhomes and camper vans then they really do need to make the effort to provide the touring facilities and arrangements described.

These points need to be covered. Increased membership numbers mean increased revenue. They could offer 1 years free membership with every new motorhome sold! And if motorhome owners like what they find when hopping from C&MC site to site, then they will subsequently continue with membership in year 2.
liky but oh oh,c m c oh no,ok pj been there done it, no liky
 
There seems to be an error of judgement in the argument ....we need the cmc more than they need us .

The incremental income are they really bothered about ? For a start once sites close end of autumn which most do, retaining a member of staff to service a relatively small customer base of which some may only want to dump take on water makes no sense.

The only way it could work is using those sites open all year which restricts options,where the staffing associated operational overheads are already in place
yep ok.pj.
 
As I have said before in the words of Robert Zimmerman, the times are a changing.
You rightly highlight that due to times changing, they have changed their name, but not their attitudes. Not to far away most of their members will own vans. And hopefully most of them won’t swallow their propaganda about legalities. When the penny finally drops that being anti WC, is costing them, then and only then times will change. Great letter barge, well done. Get stuck in their.
bob dilan too, im with you all the way. well when. ; im on the road again.try willie nelson. ok.pj. im ready now bow wow.
 
It should be the local government setting up aires in local towns
It should not be the caravan and motorhome club (of which I am a member) or the caravan and camping club.
The aires (motorhome only) should be run alongside the camping clubs.
If they are town central as a high percentage are in mainland Europe it brings much needed revenue direct to the local establishments not to a shareholder business.

Just my take on things... great letter by the way, though me writing to the club might send the wrong signal,
its all in the mined, oh no. ok pj p.s. open up the car parks. yes have barriers. but 6 vans back. you no what i mean. give us space, now! ok pj.
 
Hi, I have always thought that sites should provide basic spaces for one night stopovers. Despite being a full member here, I don't wild camp, but one nighters certainly must impact on site revenue - I have not bothered with many week long (or longer) bookings as sites are very often fully booked only on a Friday or a Saturday, presumably by motorhomers or caravanners breaking their journey to further places. If I ran a site and got a one night booking in 'peak' season I wouldn't accept it or work harder to provide parking up in some corner with use of toilets/shower/waste disposal at a very basic price. Bob
like it okpj.
 
Done. I also wrote to my MP...not expecting a reply any time soon.
probably on a other planet,or even, barnard castle. how would i no, well its been done, by quite high up. what, i do not no. but hell might freeze over. so stand back,
ok.pj.
 
Good luck to you though I imagine the CMC will justify their status quo by stating that their CLs provide the sort of services you are talking about. I’d perhaps point out that they are missing a trick by not allowing motorhomes to empty and fill up for a fee.
Regarding stellplatz/aire type places, I think that this has to be part of a wider, government led initiative. I’ve been trying for years to get anyone with authority to sit up and take notice of the growing number of motor homes on the road and how poorly we compare to our continental neighbours when it comes to facilities. I’m met it’s the usual platitudes and it is deeply frustrating and saddening. We really seem to be ruled by a country of naesayers who are reluctant to change. There is one very simple and easy solution with the ethos of looking to use what is already there. For example, there are schools in just about every village that lie unused at weekend and holidays. Erection of a barrier and coded entrance to freshwater taps and waste and/or electricity would make great use of school playgrounds and parking. This could be booked and paid for online then a code emailed to you. The Dundonald campsite on the outskirts of Belfast operates this way. It is a simple idea that would bring in some revenue for councils and provide basic stopping places but no one will run with it. Arggghhhh
 
Well apart from getting my name wrong, at least I got a reply, but no real progress. Still the same old excuses, for ever under review, although they do at last acknowledge there is a demand for Aires. I might join that ‘other club’.

Dear Mr Jones,

Thank you for your email and patience whilst we reviewed your comments,

I have been looking at your comments with our Head of Site Operations and our Technical Manager at the Club has shared some insight.

The Club are very aware of the rise in Motorhome purchase and in light of the COVID crisis, know dealerships and manufacturers have seen a further boom in sales and interest. We have understood for some time there is demand for another level of stopover, along the lines of a French Aire. However, the establishment of these would have a cost, and there would be planning approval challenges and UK safety requirements (minimum fire safety separation distances for instance) to overcome. It’s worth debating whether the provision of such facilities should be the responsibility of an organisation like the Club, or whether local authorities should mainly provide them (as is the case in some other countries – France and Australia, for instance). There are already some examples of this in the UK, although some of them operate without compliance with the safety separation distances that those same local authorities would insist on for site operators like the Club.

We have previously attempted to influence individual local authorities in respect of Motorhome parking and facility for. Our experience is that it takes much more than a letter to get their attention and staffing changes and pressure from other sectors distract from this issue. Perhaps now that there is a surge in UK tourism this will put this requirement firmly in the spotlight.

We do consider motorhome owners when designing, re-designing and reviewing sites for acquisition – looking at the availability of public transport and proximity to local amenities among other things. Many of our existing sites were acquired decades ago when demands from members were different. But as these sites remain popular despite some of them being in locations away from towns, it makes no sense to sell them. We install hardstanding’s and motor van waste points on all sites as a matter of policy, and we will continue to review what is needed by our members in the future. In our Minor works schedule motor van waste points, across our network remains a priority and we have developed the newer grill systems at over 80 of our Clubs sites and continue to roll these out. The whole purpose of our name change and revised values is to ensure we do a better job on an ongoing basis of catering for owners of motorhomes as well as caravans.

Prior to the Club’s closure the suggestion for members to pay a fee to stop off and empty waste and re-fill on sites has been considered a few times. I know a similar organisation operates in this way and whilst we continue to review this, the decision has remained by our Executive Committee not to offer this service and maintain the facilities only for members staying onsite with us and, to avoid these becoming overwhelmed during peak periods. With the current circumstances in mind, we know and expect our waste and service points will be used more frequently than ever by members and guests staying with us, as they depend on their own facilities more often. Please be assured we will continue to review our policy on this matter and if we do ever decide to introduce this service, we will share and publish details of.

I have shared your comments with our CL’s manager for consideration. As CL sites and our Affiliated Sites operate under their own steam, they are likely to differ from site to site on their own policies in respect of charging for use of their services whilst not staying, some sites may very well decide to facilitate this service, if they haven’t done previously and it fits with their operations.

I am sorry we can’t offer a solution to this at the moment, but I hope my comments assure you this is certainly an issue the Club acknowledges.

Kind Regards,

Lauren

Lauren Wall
Member Relations Manager
Caravan and Motorhome Club

T: +44 (0) 1342 336886
E: lauren.wall@camc.com
W: www.camc.com

cid:image001.png@01D290EC.27BC7730CMC_AMBER_HORIZONTAL_FULL-COLOUR_WITH-BADGE




cid:image008.jpg@01D6544C.0A41A410



EMail from Customer
Date: 11 June 2020 10:33:54

From: ianlones@gmail.com
To: memberenquiries@camc.com

Subject: Facilities for motorhomes

Dear Sirs

I should like to know what efforts the Club has in the pipeline to address the needs of touring motorhomes, both in terms of basic overnight spaces and access to water and dumps station facilities. I ask because I am reviewing whether I wish to remain a member once my subscription expires.

I along with many thousands of others am a motorhome owner and a member of the C&MC. Motorhomes offer the freedom of unscheduled travel, and the autonomy of not needing sanitary facilities every day. Because I have medical conditions which make it difficult to know far in advance when and how far I may travel on a particular day this is especially important. Indeed the motorhome is a lifeline enabling me to visit relatives in far flung places, journeys that for others can be done in a day but for me require a number of overnight stops. I have encountered many other motorhome owners with their own reasons for why it is difficult to plan and book ahead, for many others this freedom is the very essence of motorhoming.

Because my vehicle is fully self contained I use primarily CL sites as I do not need the expensive sanitary and other facilities provided at club sites, indeed in the summer months I don’t even need electricity. Although in truth I have no desire anyway to sit in a site in walking distance of nowhere with nothing but hundreds of others campers to stare at.

In the summer in the UK it is almost impossible to find sites without booking ahead. I consequently am resigned normally to spending most of my time abroad where specific facilities are provided for motorhomes, where motorhomes are generally more welcome, and where pre-booking is not required. This is something I share with the thousands of other motorhomers who stream across the Channel every year. In winter the majority of UK sites are closed even though many motorhomers travel all year.

In a normal year thousands of European motorhomers visit the UK expecting to turn up without booking and find facilities for motorhomes like at home. Every year an increasing volume of motorhomes are rented out to first timers who have little idea how to behave. Every year many fail to find a campsite space for the night. Not surprising then that there is an increasing volume of complaints about motorhomes clogging up carparks and lay-bys, and concerns about dumping of waste. With the release of Covid Rules in the near future, and the current scrabble to book up campsites, this problem is going to be seriously exacerbated by the sudden taking to the road by UK motorhomers, hirers, and the additional first timers created by the current surge in motorhome sales.

I am disappointed that the C&MC despite its new name does little to provide for the particular needs of touring motorhomes. Although it may be optimistic to expect the Club to provide new stand alone Aires / Sostas / Stellplatze on the continental model, it is notable that many European campsites have devoted part of their space to basic overnight motorhome stops, and almost universally make their dump station facilities available to touring motorhomes for a charge. It is also the case that with an automatic payment system installed these types of facility can provide an income all year without need for permanent staff.

Whenever I have in the past raised this subject on your forum all I get is smug replies from the entrenched caravanners and ex-caravanners that there is no demand for such facilities. They may not want them but many motorhomers do and with motorhome sales outstripping caravan sales perhaps more would become members if more targeted facilities were available.

The Club at least could encourage provision of motorhome specific basic CL sites, and in particular to make its dump stations available for a standalone charge. With the closure of many public toilets there will be an extraordinary demand for dump stations this year. The Camping and Caravanning Club already offers dump facilities for a charge; I see little reason why the C&MC could not do so and also encourage some CLs to do likewise.

Given that the Club has had the benefit of public money for staff furlough schemes it could at least provide this small public service, even if only to members.

Regards
Ian Lones
Architect


______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com
______________________________________________________________________
 
At least you got the courtesy of a reply and some consideration of the points you raised.

For information and potential transmission to the campre lobby, a gentleman involved in the creation of the Aire at Cobh (east of Cork, Rep of Ireland) indicated to me that spacing for Motorhomes at that location was based on the separation distance between HGVs when parking up, and for drivers overnighting, potentially with hazardous loads. This if I remember was about a 2 metre separation. This was ratified by the local fire authority.

The caravan act (certainly in N. Ireland) deals almost exclusively with mobile homes where cars and decking or steps mean that a 6 metre separation has value. It has virtually no relevance to Motorhome parking which has become more prevalent and necessary in the last 10 to 15 years. It is an example of events moving faster than legislation or recognition by local (or central) government.

In my dealings with my own local council, were shared parking is available in a local car park, I lobbied for no more than 2 metre separation. This was based on the belief that any wider would permit cars to park between the Motorhomes. Thus neutralising any safety benefit. I also try to make the point that a Motorhome presents little more danger of fire and explosion than a petrol fuelled car driven by a smoker.

Hopefully I have attached a couple of photos of Cobh Aire showing separation between vans.

4CD07FD5-F1CA-4FDD-A3FE-B6F5E9B77C0F.jpeg
2559DF99-586A-4C8A-9493-D927A33FB7B1.jpeg
E13258AC-EBD0-4413-98FA-EA3FB82C0E9A.jpeg


Davy
 
At least you got the courtesy of a reply and some consideration of the points you raised.

For information and potential transmission to the campre lobby, a gentleman involved in the creation of the Aire at Cobh (east of Cork, Rep of Ireland) indicated to me that spacing for Motorhomes at that location was based on the separation distance between HGVs when parking up, and for drivers overnighting, potentially with hazardous loads. This if I remember was about a 2 metre separation. This was ratified by the local fire authority.

The caravan act (certainly in N. Ireland) deals almost exclusively with mobile homes where cars and decking or steps mean that a 6 metre separation has value. It has virtually no relevance to Motorhome parking which has become more prevalent and necessary in the last 10 to 15 years. It is an example of events moving faster than legislation or recognition by local (or central) government.

In my dealings with my own local council, were shared parking is available in a local car park, I lobbied for no more than 2 metre separation. This was based on the belief that any wider would permit cars to park between the Motorhomes. Thus neutralising any safety benefit. I also try to make the point that a Motorhome presents little more danger of fire and explosion than a petrol fuelled car driven by a smoker.

Hopefully I have attached a couple of photos of Cobh Aire showing separation between vans.

View attachment 84199View attachment 84200View attachment 84201

Davy
Do you have a name of a contact there? CAMpRA would like particularly get input on the decision to go for 2m spacing, backed up if possible by the Fire Service. It’s a useful precedent. I seem to remember incidentally, but I can’t remember where on the continent a sign in mixed carpark requesting vans using the carpark to use alternate spaces...which gives a 2.4m spacing...and makes it possible for cars to park between.
 

Users who viewed this discussion (Total:0)

Back
Top