That is exactly what I find so annoying. This arrogant sense of entitlement so many motorists have. It's not as though we have some "special rights" as drivers, to exclusive use of the public highway. Even here, it's being demonstrated from people who (one supposes) ye'd enjoy socialising with of an evening, given the shared interest. Actually, based on what I'm reading, I'd hope not to meet them.
Yes I agree with you 100% , the demonstration of arrogance by many drivers that say because they pay "road tax", which hasn't existed since 1937, ( did I mention that previously ?
) they claim to have more right to be on the road, but that is not correct, we ALL pay for the upkeep of the roads through our general taxes. Bicycles and motor vehicles have equal right to use the public highway.
Certain drivers must realise that Vehicle Excise Duty is only a tax for owning a motor vehicle and pay or the admin, nothing else, and these days the more a vehicle pollutes the more we pay. Bicycles don't pollute so they are free from excise duty. The duty is paid for each and every motor vehicle we own even if a second or third vehicle sits unused on the driveway.
Excise duty, MOT's and
insurance for bicycles will never happen, get used to it folks.
The cost of the admin, new laws and enforcement systems needed will be far too costly for the tiny, almost none existent, number of times it is needed.
Just searched forum for "lycra lice". Only one result showed.
Lycra clad idiots is a more common term , the thing is almost every sport uses lycra these days because it reduces drag at speed. Cycling started it all off with "skin suits" but it is used in athletics field sports, skiing ( downhill , slalom, cross country and biathlon ) The motorists who use the derogatory term see Lycra as a material that females wear which I assume they don't have a problem with.
Here's one for the ladies...