maingate
Full Member
- Posts
- 12,553
- Likes
- 17,971
I've had a couple of Motorolas. Not bad, but completely outclassed by Huawei, Samsung and RedmiI got my first Motorola around the early 90s,I've had numerous since then,I've actually never owned any other brand of mobile,I've currently got the G7 which I think is superb for the money. For some reason it's a brand you don't hear about very much and although they've changed ownership over the years they've always produced quality and competitive prices phones imo.
I've had a couple of Motorolas. Not bad, but completely outclassed by Huawei, Samsung and Redmi
They are only outclassed if you've used a better phone,I haven't.![]()
I have changed from an iPhone5 to a Moto g6 and I am happy with it .. but I am a very light phone user. A £10 top up lasts me months.The only downside with an Android phone is that you cannot see the screen on a sunny day, the Apple phones are far better.
You are on a sticky wicket I think with say a Huawei phone, which were (and still are I think) cut off from the Google infrastructure since Trump took against them.
I wouldn't touch anything that did not have access to the Google Play Store.
I've been using Motorola (well Lenovo) for many years, and found them very good, solid hardware, not expensive. Currently running a Moto G6. Buy a current model and they promise Android updates for at least 2 years, and regular security updates which they do push out regularly. Mine got Android 8 > 9 pretty much as soon as it was out.
Very clean version of Android, little bloatware added, never mind massively tailored "launchers". As I said pretty much pure.
Also running an Iphone 5s which is still supported and regularly updated. I don't particularly like it, but it has an essential feature for me which is WiFi calling, essential inside my house where there is no signal on any network, so dependent on my landline broadband for that. Only a few rather expensive Android phones have that natively, worth checking that if you think it might be important to you. E.g wan't to use it on London underground, or somewhere with WiFi but no mobile signal.
Three used to have an app for WiFi calling on Android, but stopped supporting that a while ago, which was a bummer, hence why I have the Iphone, gifted by a relative locked into the contract/upgrade/Apple ecosystem. Battery life terrible.
I think the newest phones have dark mode as an option,I wonder if that will make for easier reading in sunlight? Mind you there's little chance of sun...
I told plusnet their fibre was cheaper to new customers than my steam driven service. But that wasn’t good enough, others were doing fibre for less than Plusnet, so I’m off said I. So they matched the competition!I am fed up with my broadband from Plusnet and thinking of replacing my BT landline with mobile data.
My line had gradually become noisier and slower over time despite Plusnet assuring me noise on the line did not affect broadband.
In the first week of December 2019 I started to suffer frequent dropouts. I bought a new router following advice from Plusnet and they adjusted their settings several times. Eventually, on 21st January, the second Open Reach engineer sent to fix the problem found water and a poor connection in one of their cabinets. The line is still slow but now much less noisy and does not drop the connection so frequently.
Open Reach can provide a fibre connection (FTC) on the edge of our village with my final connection via the existing copper overhead wire. Plusnet would charge a little less than I currently pay for my slower connection but significantly more than they would charge a new customer which puts me off.
I think that using a data SIM in a mobile would be cheaper, faster than my existing connection and could be used away from home. Coverage maps from the mobile network suppliers and OFCOM suggest that there is a good signal at my location from Three.
I could borrow long term a Samsung Galaxy Ace mobile but am not fond of Google and Android things.
I rather fancy a Nokia Lumia 640 XL Windows phone.
So question 1 is: Any comments and advice on Windows phones?
Question 2 is about using a mobile to download data to update my Garmin maps.
The Garmin Express System Requirements specify:
High speed Internet access (Not for use with dial-up, mobile or satellite connections)
I have asked Garmin to clarify whether this excludes tethering a mobile to my PC and await their reply.
In the meantime has anyone tested this requirement? I will need to be able to update my Garmin periodically.
They're still outclassed, even if you're oblivious of it.They are only outclassed if you've used a better phone,I haven't.![]()
Not everyone requires, nor can afford, something that they believe, to be best in class.They're still outclassed, even if you're oblivious of it.
That'd be a good point, but for the comparative prices of Huawei, Redmi and Motorola phones. All three brands have models at different price points, but for each given price band, the Motorola one is least good.Not everyone requires, nor can afford, something that they believe, to be best in class.
my smartphone is an alcatel running some version of android, it allows me to make phonecalls, send a text and use whatsap to send a piccy. which is all i need a phone to do. i can even get maps on it should my paper ones self destruct. anything more expensive would be just a waste of money.
What made you chose that aerial Jim? I sometimes think I will get one for the van for times I have poor signal but wouldn’t want it permanently fixed
Ah okay, wasn’t sure if you had been in touch with3 and found that’s what they use. Please update with how it works when you have it. It may be directional could be better using in a house but omni is less messing in a van.That one is an omni-directional aerial. I thought it better than the Poynting XPOL2 which is a directional aerial.
I'm now revising this thought. The storms may have affected their network for a while, but the weather had improved (until this evening) with no matching improvement in the network.There have been issues since the weekend, and on Sunday, in the storms, it was very iffy indeed. But that may be due to network reconfiguration. Instead of ping times aroung 38ms, I was seeing 200ms times, starting at the third step of the tracert. In my area, Three said they were dealing with a "complex network issue" (whatever that means). Since that notice disappeared at the weekend, speeds have been more variable. I suspect that the storms have affected some of their microwave backhaul links.