Drover
Full Member
- Posts
- 948
- Likes
- 1,256
Clogged up with cars last year when we went there, they were still building the tram system.They have one in Edinburgh that’s cheap as chips, yet Edinburgh is the most polluted city in Scotland.
Clogged up with cars last year when we went there, they were still building the tram system.They have one in Edinburgh that’s cheap as chips, yet Edinburgh is the most polluted city in Scotland.
They started the work in 2008, and finished in 2014. I don’t know what you saw last year possibly maintenance. But the current system fell well short of what was originally proposed. The original proposed system would have taken the tram through to Leith. But trying to install tram systems into modern cities is very expensive, would take decades in some cases, and is way to disruptive.Clogged up with cars last year when we went there, they were still building the tram system.
We have nearly finished building our small house (single story) including installing a air source heat pump with underfloor heating.
It cost £11,000 . Smallest heat pump available. The grant at the time of purchase gives us £5,000 back (quarterly) over 7 years depending on usage.
Crikey, they have brought it right to the Yorkshire boundary.It wouldn’t be too bad if it was just Manchester City but it covers a large area
View attachment 104790
Gridlocked from St Andrews Square to Newhaven.They started the work in 2008, and finished in 2014. I don’t know what you saw last year possibly maintenance. But the current system fell well short of what was originally proposed. The original proposed system would have taken the tram through to Leith. But trying to install tram systems into modern cities is very expensive, would take decades in some cases, and is way to disruptive.
Gridlocked from St Andrews Square to Newhaven.
Due to be finished 2023.
We stayed in leith
If they want cars, trucks and other vehicles out of high populated areas for health reasons a tax to drive there is not a deterrent for most of the UK's population.....
The city of London's congestion charge keeps on expanding
View attachment 104811
But simply improving public transport and reducing costs won’t work. Sadly we will just have put up with this until levels fall lower in future.
It will certainly put a stop to a good few members being able to go to the Littleborough meetsCrikey, they have brought it right to the Yorkshire boundary.
Re travelling to Hollingworth Lake.....I travel via Huddersfield, Sowerby Bridge and Ripponden.
Peter,
You can get over to our side via Holme moss to Holmfirth.
I think it will be the end of the road for me.
The fogs are a lot better than when I was kid because everyone and the London power stations used to burn coal, now it looks like the M25 will become the boundary for the ULEZ.Also London has one of the best tube systems in the world which is still being expanded yet suffers from terrible pollution. Part of the problem being that London sits in a sink where the centre is lower than the outskirts worsening the pollution. The fact is the LEZ has made little difference if you compare it prior to the LEZ first being set up. But as we don’t know what level of traffic would be in use today it’s hard to decide if it’s viable.
But simply improving public transport and reducing costs won’t work. Sadly we will just have put up with this until levels fall lower in future.
You could hardly call it a system ! Now being extended to Granton/Newhaven as per original plan [?] . This will make the tram LINE a bit longerThey started the work in 2008, and finished in 2014. I don’t know what you saw last year possibly maintenance. But the current system fell well short of what was originally proposed. The original proposed system would have taken the tram through to Leith. But trying to install tram systems into modern cities is very expensive, would take decades in some cases, and is way to disruptive.
Spot on, Glasgow went the opposite way with its five motorways.You could hardly call it a system ! Now being extended to Granton/Newhaven as per original plan [?] . This will make the tram LINE a bit longer
Manchester already has a tram system . Used it a few years ago and was quite impressed .
Edinburgh , unlike many European equivalents , has never bit the bullet regards traffic , particularly in the Old Town . They have widened pavements , changed traffic light sequences etc hoping to annoy the motorist enough to chase them away .
It will be a major problem driving wise for me personally but they need to properly pedestrianise the Old Town
There were plans to build a ring route through the heart of the Old Town . Thankfully it was scrubbed .Spot on, Glasgow went the opposite way with its five motorways.
Most journeys in Glasgow involve getting onto a motorway, then coming off close to your destination. In Edinburgh it’s a nightmare for motorists. But the tram was unable to take the shortest and most viable route into the bargain. For me the tram is no better than a good bus service from the airport. And when you think that the alternative would have been a dual carriageway all the way to Inverness, it made no sense whatsoever.
First before I start I am not an SNP fan, but I did support them on this Alcam.There were plans to build a ring route through the heart of the Old Town . Thankfully it was scrubbed .
Timed the airport bus a while back . Waverley Bridge [virtually my doorstep] to airport door 25 minutes . Think the tram was a vanity [bung?] project .
Not sure about reference to Inverness dual carriageway ?