Honest answers please...LOL Fuel consumption?

The last four trips have been 184 miles each, same route, driving sensibly but carrying different weights, the electronic mpg reading has stayed at 30.4mpg. This is on a 2.2, 125bhp Rimor 63 plate. Most I have ever achieved is 31.2mpg, least I have achieved 29mpg.

I try for the maximum mpg but it doesn't make an awful lot of difference money wise when you look at the figures.
 
I run a self build Citroen Relay high top long wheelbase. 85 ltr water tank. Two leisure batteries, fully fitted out and with myself 18 stone plus the missus 11 stone aboard I get 34 mpg on average. It is the 2.2 litre turbo 2004 model. Cannot fault it, drives like a car with plenty of punch, will do 80 mph but I try for 60 mph steady all day. I used to drive yanks so I have good training in getting the maximum mpg from any vehicle.

18 stone,think you are over fueling.:danger::wave:
 
Ah.... but better to be moving slowly than to not be moving at all cos some stupidly expensive pre-ordained and pre-programmed to fail black box or similar has you sat in a workshop waiting room weeping quietly while you part with the National Debt of Greece to get your engine working again eh?

Once you realise how easy it is to build in a 'time-bomb' in electronics to corrupt the memory or blow a component or circuit and render it useless BY DESIGN to force the consumer to spend on repair or better yet a replacement after a certain time/hours run combination or similar, then you develop a healthy cynicism and distrust of anything managed by and utterly dependent upon electronics.

We all wander about believing that electronic devices fail randomly and through natural causes - where really well-designed solid-state stuff should be robust as hell and very long-lived... yet they fail with monotonous regularity. Yes some of this will be bad quality control and making it on the cheap (even if it costs YOU a mint), but I think its just too good a trick to miss (and untraceable) for global Mfrs to overlook the revenue opportunity for giving aftermarket sales and new sales a 'helping hand'.

Mfrs LOVE Electronics - they give them opportunities to ring-fence the product to be supported by their own after-sales network for added revenue through its product life. They can (and do) code their ECU's etc. to prevent access by independents etc. and code parts like injectors so you can't buy one and chage it without the Dealer encoding it and so forth.

Our Govt COULD easily insist that all electronics on consumer goods were 'open protocol' to eliminate skullduggery - but they don't. No doubt the powerful Mfr Lobby and Money sees to that, so Joe Public gets to pick up a bigger tab than he needs to.

Cynical? Moi? Too right.

Right... Where's me Tinfoil Hat?

The eu has put in place rules that 3 partys should be able to reprogram,in the past makers have had to pay big moneys to m/soft but this has changed now ,toyota and nissan now wright there own programes using linux so third partys can get this free,but i do agree with you about electrics and built in self destruction.
 
I read this david in a motor mag in tesco when i was trying to get out of shoping duties and core linux is a language,i see you have not yet truly read into it yet but there is time over winter in that nice french chateau you live in with the child bride.
Any way im geting 30mpg out of the 2800t iveco 6.4 ton with low diff which should improve when i get the new high ratio one in .
 
Hi have a 2012 hobby siesta ford transit based 2.2 six speed 3.5 ton and it does 25mpg at 70mph did get 27mpg when we went to Spain but that could have been down to different diesel on continent
 
30 mpg at 45mph david with a 8/41 diff rpm 2500 at 50mph rpm 2800 at that speed the new 11/43 diff will reduce rpm by 710 so i should be about 2100 at 50 mph and thats much qt and easy to drive relaxed speed.
 
Last edited:
Heating oil 43/45 litre by 20 c oil £2 =for two ltrs tesco rapseed david not that i would do this you understand.
 
Fiat Ducati 3ltr twin turbo Manual 6 speed, 7metre ,4tonne 28 - 30 mpg at 60 mph any faster van starts to get a bit twitchy along with me
 
Autoroller 600 on a twin wheel 2.4 Diesel transit 2009. big van with bug luton. On a recent run to Scotlnand I was in a hurry and was doing at least 70mph all the way, it did 17MPG, If I do 60MPH as i did on the way back about 24MPG, made a big difference.

Before I had the air suspension fitted I coulndt drive it over 60, now its rock solid even in high winds.
 

Users who viewed this discussion (Total:0)

Back
Top