maureenandtom
Full Member
- Posts
- 1,248
- Likes
- 1,962
Byelaws. We have had a very small success in opposing byelaws affecting motorhomers. Byelaws seem, on the face of it, to offer councils very effective means of controlling us. They can be used to make parking (decriminalised) into a crime. The one defect about byelaws, as far as councils are concerned, is that they must be approved by a higher authority - central government. They are supposed to be used when there is no other existing alternative so a reasonable opposition to a byelaw is that there are other alternatives already available and on at least two occasions byelaws have been refused by central government after complaints from motorhomers. On a third, after a conviction in a magistrates' court, an appeal court overturned the conviction and, so far as I know, that, still valid, byelaw has never been used again for prosecution or for the summary issue of a Fixed Penalty Notice.
This has all changed. There is now an alternative to a byelaw. A Public Spaces Protection Order. This, despite its friendly name, is no more than the ability of the council to pass its own byelaws and disobedience becomes a crime. PSPOs have been passed a number of times and there is very little we can do about them.
Mostly they are about low level disorder. Cambridge Council, for example, used a PSPO Public Spaces Protection Order (PSPO) | Cambridge City Council
to prohibit advertising to sell the hire of punts. Try that in Cambridge and you might incur a £1000 fine.

In other places, google them, you can be prosecuted for spitting or you can have unopened alcoholic drinks confiscated. Don't give up your recently purchase bottle of wine to a council employed (or sub-contracted) Civil Enforcement Officer (parking warden) and you might get a £1000 fine.
Salford prohibits the public from certain places during certain hours to prevent people gathering when, for example, drugs might be sold or used. The logic is that the council can't prevent drugs being sold but it can prevent anyone being in that place at certain times by simply preventing ALL of us from being there. If there's nobody there then no drugs can be bought and sold. Simple. Dudley Street, proposed Public Spaces Protection Order •
Salford City Council
One, the Brighton and Hove PSPO, Public Space Protection Orders | Brighton & Hove City Council contains this prohibition “occupying any vehicle, caravan, tent or any other structure" (no limit on time) and this has now been used to remove motorhomes as we have seen in the thread about it. The council gave itself permission to remove the vehicles itself.
It's up to the council alone to pass the PSPO and there seems to be nothing we can do about it other than apply for a judicial review within six weeks of the order being made. Six weeks is hardly any time at all to gather evidence to present to a court so any objections must be made at the public consultation stage. The council need not act on objections. The Brighton and Hove PSPO was objected to by no less an authority than the Equality and Human Rights Commission but the council ignored it and passed the order. So much for the Equality and Human Rights Commission. If the council can ignore that body then what chance for the rest of us?
PSPOs, it seems to me, will be used increasingly in the future to control us. Forget Byelaws, TROs or Off-street Parking Orders. Councils have a new tool. Brighton and Hove is the trail blazer and other councils will be watching its success. There'll be plenty more of these orders.
We're doomed.
This has all changed. There is now an alternative to a byelaw. A Public Spaces Protection Order. This, despite its friendly name, is no more than the ability of the council to pass its own byelaws and disobedience becomes a crime. PSPOs have been passed a number of times and there is very little we can do about them.
Mostly they are about low level disorder. Cambridge Council, for example, used a PSPO Public Spaces Protection Order (PSPO) | Cambridge City Council
to prohibit advertising to sell the hire of punts. Try that in Cambridge and you might incur a £1000 fine.

In other places, google them, you can be prosecuted for spitting or you can have unopened alcoholic drinks confiscated. Don't give up your recently purchase bottle of wine to a council employed (or sub-contracted) Civil Enforcement Officer (parking warden) and you might get a £1000 fine.
Salford prohibits the public from certain places during certain hours to prevent people gathering when, for example, drugs might be sold or used. The logic is that the council can't prevent drugs being sold but it can prevent anyone being in that place at certain times by simply preventing ALL of us from being there. If there's nobody there then no drugs can be bought and sold. Simple. Dudley Street, proposed Public Spaces Protection Order •
Salford City Council
One, the Brighton and Hove PSPO, Public Space Protection Orders | Brighton & Hove City Council contains this prohibition “occupying any vehicle, caravan, tent or any other structure" (no limit on time) and this has now been used to remove motorhomes as we have seen in the thread about it. The council gave itself permission to remove the vehicles itself.
It's up to the council alone to pass the PSPO and there seems to be nothing we can do about it other than apply for a judicial review within six weeks of the order being made. Six weeks is hardly any time at all to gather evidence to present to a court so any objections must be made at the public consultation stage. The council need not act on objections. The Brighton and Hove PSPO was objected to by no less an authority than the Equality and Human Rights Commission but the council ignored it and passed the order. So much for the Equality and Human Rights Commission. If the council can ignore that body then what chance for the rest of us?
PSPOs, it seems to me, will be used increasingly in the future to control us. Forget Byelaws, TROs or Off-street Parking Orders. Councils have a new tool. Brighton and Hove is the trail blazer and other councils will be watching its success. There'll be plenty more of these orders.
We're doomed.