Are smart motorways smart

Fisherman

Full Member
Posts
12,245
Likes
36,233
M1 fatal smash puts spotlight back on Northamptonshire's smart motorway
Police say absence of hard shoulder contributed to 19-year-old's death near Luton


By Kevin Nicholls

Wednesday, 10th March 2021, 12:52 pm

Police and a coroner have raised more concerns about the safety of smart motorways after an HGV ploughed into the back of a broken-down people carrier on the M1, killing a 19-year-old.


The smash happened near Luton on a section of motorway where the hard shoulder was being used as 'live lane' by speeding traffic.

A similar section of smart motorway has been in operation for the last two years between Northampton and junction 19.

[IMG]

A stretch of the M1 between Northampton and junction 19 has already been turned into a smart motorway way with no hard shoulder.
Photo: Getty Images



Work on a £373million upgrade on another stretch south from Northampton to Milton Keynes is due to finish next year.

Bedfordshire Police told an inquest into the death of Zahid Ahmed this week: "The absence of a hard shoulder contributed to the collision.

"Had the [deceased’s] vehicle been able to stop in a location other than that of a live lane, the offending HGV would not have driven into the back of it."

Northamptonshire Police Chief Constable Nick Adderley has confessed last year that he is "not a fan" of the smart motorways.

[IMG]


Work to convert the M1 into a smart motorway between Northampton and Milton Keynes is due to be finished next year
Mr Ahmed was in a rear passenger seat of a Kia Sedona which stopped near junction 11A.

Three vehicles managed to swerve past the stranded vehicle, which had its hazard lights on, before a HGV which failed to brake hit it at nearly 60mph.

Lorry driver Wojciech Bukowski, 65, was later charged with causing death by dangerous driving and jailed for more than four years.

The crash in December 2019 was on a stretch of the M1 with an 'actively managed hard shoulder' where the emergency lane can be used by traffic following advice from overhead signs to ease congestion.

Both the current and planned upgrades in Northamptonshire will be 'all lane running' with no hard shoulder at any time.

Both types of smart motorway are controlled by matrix signs operated remotely using traffic cameras and have refuges at regular intervals for emergencies.

Following Mr Ahmed's inquest, Bedfordshire coroner Tom Stoate issued a Prevention of Future Deaths report to Highways England, raising concerns about the absence of a hard shoulder on the motorway.

Mr Stoate wrote: "The collision occurred primarily due to the failure of the lorry driver to perceive and respond to the presence of the Kia in enough time to avoid a collision, and also due to the presence of the Kia in a running lane of the motorway as no alternative was available to the driver.

"The vehicle in which the deceased was a passenger suffered a mechanical defect which caused it to lose power.

"It is not clear where the vehicle could have pulled to a halt in a safe place in these circumstances, given that there was no hard shoulder and all lanes were live. I consider that could create a risk of future deaths."

In January, MPs asked for evidence from Northamptonshire's M1 users after launching an inquiry into controversial traffic management systems on smart motorways.


Tory MP Huw Merriman, who chairs the Commons Transport Select committee said: "The public's confidence in smart motorways has been dented by increasing fatalities on these roads."

A investigation by BBC's Panorama last year revealed 38 people died on Britain’s 200 miles of smart motorways in the previous five years, compared to 90 a year over the whole 2,300-mile network.

But the Government's own stock-take report which followed pointed to lower fatal casualty rates for smart motorways.

At least two other coroners have expressed public concerns following deaths on the M1 in Yorkshire.


One went so far as to refer Highways England, which manages the country's motorway network, to the Crown Prosecution Service to consider if corporate manslaughter charges were appropriate.

https://www.northamptonchron.co.uk/...EMtataT3XW19fFHBKYhDMB_nFhI9V5nN7hmX-8I0qoBik
 
As a regular user of the m6 between Manchester and Birmingham (at least 4 days a week)

I've seen some horrendous accidents AND near misses on the 'smart' sections....

As a system it could work well BUT general driving standards and limitations with the system itself mean it doesn't...

Also when something does go pear-shaped it's very difficult to get emergency services to the scene through solid lanes of traffic.
 
agree totally with tim 120..........DEATHTRAPS.........cannot understand the thinking and logic for these motorways sometimes i wonder if the powers that be who make these decisions just dont have the common sense or logic or foresight..........to envisage the outcome.........its like their brain is only focused on easing congestion////and not consequences......
wonder if they have given thought to how motorways will be in 10/20 yrs time///////re congestion etc..........
 
If they deserved the name smart, they would have automatic stopped vehicle camera recognition in place before they opened as smart. The cameras would trigger the left lane to be closed within seconds. The technology is available. They will be installing it soon! they just decided to do the motorway conversion a few years before the safety system. Someone is responsible for that decision.
 
In the fire service when assessing any risk we always factored in human error.
Quite simply this system is dependent upon everyone driving within the speed limit, paying full attention to what’s going on, and being fully conversant with the demands of this technology. There seems inadequate latitude for human error, and without that latitude accidents and sadly deaths will occur. We are not machines we all err at times, and our minds all wander when driving at times, particularly when driving long distances on motorways.
 
Not a fan either. Just as anything else, when you push capacity to the limit, when things go wrong, they go wrong very quickly.

Pretty sure the junction in question (Luton) the hard shoulder is a permanent live lane running into a Smart motorway section, which are probably worse than lengths of Smart motorway.
Saying that, I'm on that road upto 8 times a week and incidents are few.

Got to agree with points in post 6 too.
 
The M42 works, but if you break down you are within sight of an emergency refuge. Unfortunately someone decided that you could stretch the distance between refuges. It reminds me of the man with the donkey who kept reducing its feed and getting the same work out of it, until it died of starvation.
 
Personally I have thought from day one that they are one of the worst road "improvements" ever come up with and should be scrapped ASAP.

They came with one sole purpose - add road capacity in the cheapest possible way.
 
Last edited:
I've not checked any data, and doubt I will, but it could be accidents are less on these smart motorways than on an even more congested motorway.

Anyway, my vote would have been for more variable speed limits and hard shoulders used as originally intended.
 
I suppose if you look at most transport systems capacity is usually static or less than max during off peak times, I'm thinking bus, tube, train during what we knew as rush hour or a large event such as Twickenham rugby/concert and the like, packed in like sardines, which is no more than an inconvenience really. A stationary vehicle with traffic approaching at motorway speed and nowhere to go is potentially lethal and has proved to be so.
 
They are currently down grading the M27 into a 'Smart' motorway I shall use it exactly the same way as I use all 'Smart' motorways and that is I will not use the hard shoulder even if it means my journey takes awhile longer. Most stupid idea and the most inappropriate name.
 
When they first started altering motorways, I initially thought, the same as the bean counters at the DOT,what a simple cheap way to increasing road space by 25%.
Of course, what I didn’t take into account, although the bean counters might have,was vehicles with faults stopping on the road, be they badly serviced, out of fuel, inherent manufactured faults (BMW shutting down errors) or plain stupid drivers failing to read matrix signs, using the roads. Tbh, vehicles don’t often just stop without warning. Time enough to reach a refuge? Probably.
But,there are so many matrix signs left on after a problem has been cleared beggars belief. Is it any wonder, people take the instructions with a pinch of salt.I remember the matrix on the M11 saying that the A120 was closed, hours after a blond US President had landed at Stansted.
 

Users who viewed this discussion (Total:0)

Back
Top